I'd like to read the specific quotes from Clinton and the corresponding direct quotes from Comey. And I may try to find those (if they are available, I don't know if the letter is). But the summary in the msn.com article doesn't convince me Clinton lied under oath, as there is a fairly easy explanation for all of them (including quotes from Comey). For example, in the piece of evidence, the "nothing mark classified", Clinton could easily argue the portion markings on the three pieces of e-mail simply were not seen or marked properly (and I believe some reports say a couple of them shouldn't have been marked classified). I'm not saying Clinton was being honest, I'm saying it's a viable argument in court. The second example, about the attorneys reviewing every e-mail, is not even a contradiction (reading and reviewing do not have to mean the same thing) nor could it be proven Clinton didn't know that every e-mail wasn't read.
Again, if I get more time, I may try to read the specific quotes (if available), but the four examples summarized in the article are going to be hard to prove, in the manner in which they were summarized.
And, just to be clear, I'm not saying Clinton is innocent. I'm saying Clinton is slippery enough to parse words in such a way to avoid lying, while not telling the whole truth.