- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
- Messages
- 67,218
- Reaction score
- 28,530
- Location
- Lower Hudson Valley, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Post the contents of the bill and not selected sentences.
Already posted.
try to keep up with the discussion
Post the contents of the bill and not selected sentences.
Already posted.
try to keep up with the discussion
The bill would have cost U.S. companies that move overseas $143 million in additional taxes over the next decade, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation, which analyzes tax legislation for Congress.
Allow people and businesses keep more of what they earn thus they won't have to move anywhere. TX has learned to do that, why can't Washington? S?ince when is it the role of the govt. to create equal outcome
Those corporations also depend upon the infrastructure we provide - roads, education, dependable power grids, security worldwide...do you think such infrastructure should be free to corporations?
Those corporations also depend upon the infrastructure we provide - roads, education, dependable power grids, security worldwide...do you think such infrastructure should be free to corporations?
Ah, careful editing strikes again:You certainly have a different definition of tax reduction
Ah, careful editing strikes again:
Companies moving into the U.S. would have seen their tax bills drop by $357 million over the same period.
GOP Blocks Tax Hike on Firms Moving Overseas - ABC News
An appeal to "race to the bottom", we should lower our taxes and enviro regs to the lowest level.Allow people and businesses keep more of what they earn thus they won't have to move anywhere.
Of course, Texas does not offer tax incentives to companies to attract them to Texas...nope.TX has learned to do that, why can't Washington? S?ince when is it the role of the govt. to create equal outcome
I thought we were discussing the entire bill.Thought we were talking about U.S. Companies moving out of this country.
I'm using them, I'll let you imagine them.Amazing how the same people like you continue to spout the same rhetoric over and over again, ignoring content and substance. How about using some more four letter words in describing me
An appeal to "race to the bottom", we should lower our taxes and enviro regs to the lowest level.
Brilliant!
Of course, Texas does not offer tax incentives to companies to attract them to Texas...nope.
I thought we were discussing the entire bill.I'm using them, I'll let you imagine them.
Look in my eye...
Those items are paid for out the use taxes collected from the people. You really need to learn what taxes people actually pay and what those taxes are for. Elizabeth Warren loves having low information voters supporting her.
Is this coming from the same guy who says that govt should not pick winners and losers?I have no problem with tax incentives ....
Why do you ask about "free"? Who said anything about "free"?
If you're so precious about the use of infrastructure, maybe you should be happy to help corporations move out so they won't use so much of it.
You do realize this bill that you seem to support also gave tax breaks for expenses involved in moving a facility to the US from overseas, right? You gotta hate that, don't you?
So only individual citizens should pay taxes? The corporations don't use and benefit from those roads, the education, the national security?
Is this coming from the same guy who says that govt should not pick winners and losers?
To increase US jobsAsk yourself, why does Obama support the bill?
It has a net INCREASE in debt, ie, less revenue....which is what you want.Did you even bother to read the net tax affect of this bill?
Wrong:that is why Obama supports it, punish business and generate more tax revenue.
you do too, by paying taxes....duh.We all know you support a 3.9 TRILLION dollar govt.
Seriously? Again, you can leave, no one forces you to stay....ultimately.The question is why?
My state, Arizona, is a conservative nightmare, thank you very much.You cannot seem to get what you want done through your state therefore you want to spread the liberal misery equally to everyone else.
So just to be clear....you ARE the guy that argues that govt should not pick winners and losers....correct?Where the hell does...
Gimmesometruth;1063594709]To increase US jobs It has a net INCREASE in debt, ie, less revenue....which is what you want. Wrong:
The difference — $214 million — would have been added to the budget deficit.
you do too, by paying taxes....duh.
Seriously? Again, you can leave, no one forces you to stay....ultimately.
My state, Arizona, is a conservative nightmare, thank you very much.
So just to be clear....you ARE the guy that argues that govt should not pick winners and losers....correct?
Other than the GOP having their lips firmly wrapped around the cocks of businesses? It's possible that there are other things in the bill other than tax hikes on traitorous companies.
Wait, you asked WHY there is support for this bill. You are not addressing the response.Obama has done nothing ...
Ergo, you support this govt.....duh.Yes, I probably pay more in taxes each year than you make.
Let see....Texas has more illegals...yet is doing well.....ergo...illegals are not the problem.As for your state being a nightmare, maybe "your" president ought to defend the borders.
Sides haves facts. Maybe there is no other side of the story. Did you click on the link? It didn't contain the entire text of the bill.
You just said you had no problem with tax incentives, ie, picking winners and losers....but previously you argued govt should NOT pick winners and losers.....ergo, you are contradicting yourself.How do I support the govt. picking winners and losers?
Wait, you asked WHY there is support for this bill. You are not addressing the response.
Ergo, you support this govt.....duh.Let see....Texas has more illegals...yet is doing well.....ergo...illegals are not the problem.
If we just had large petro deposits....gee wiz.