Im saying you dont have **** to proove homosexual men are any less efficient because they shower with straights.
That is far from the statement you've made earlier.
But then again, I am not arguing about homosexuals alone, I am arguing about any two groups of people where at least one has a sexual attraction for the other.
:rofl
Do you not see the inherent flaw in your argument?
Your advocating seperating straight guys from gay guys to avoid sexual distraction, right?
How will they be any less distracted in a shower full of GAY GUYS. :laughat:
Your point is valid (finally), however there are not that many gay people in the military and it would minimize the unnecessary distraction to separate them. As I said many times already before, the military's policy is to avoid distractions when possible, with an emphasis on when possible.
Im saying you have no proof to tell me that gays in the army currently are less efficient or distracted to any certain degree which is causing problems within the army.
So you're saying that I have no proof that, specifically homosexuals are less efficient (and not generally everyone), and because of that you believe that my reasoning is wrong.
Well that's just a weird decision, to separate between what is already known about straight females to straight males sexual attractions and what you believe you know on homosexuals-straights sexual attractions.
Im OK with separating men and women because of the physical differences between the two and the fact that many women are not comfortable showering with men and the fact that it tends to be the norm in our society, even in school during P.E classes.
I'm sorry but that has to be the most ridiculous claim made so far in this thread.
How is their physical difference got more to do with separating the showers than the sexual attraction between the two sexes?
Don't you see how far from reality the argument you make here is? Don't you see how ridiculously irrational it is?
In P.E classes, there is a separation because of their abilities.
Everyone, however, even the handicapped, are capable of taking a shower or sleeping in a bed.
What your saying is flawed. You wish to seperate sexualities so as to lessen sexual distraction.
Thank you, that's exactly it.
That means we cannot place homosexuals with straight guys or each other. So we would have to put each and every individual homosexual in a shower full of women.
Already answered that above.
It is a problem that would be allowed to occur, seeing that the options are few.
I dont have evidence that doesnt account for homosexuality either but what you are advocating is impracticle.
I am not advocating anything, I am speaking from the military point of view and how would they minimize the caused distraction.
Simple as. What harm does it do to you as a straight man if a homosexual has a little crush on you?
I have no problem with that, I wouldn't have problem with taking a shower with a homosexual too.
It's not my personal "can or cannot", it is the military's policy, and so far it is has been working.
Its a fact. Women are far more vulnerable to sexual abuse in these circumstances.
Give me a break.
Not at all. I just find it amusing how you are creating reason to hide behind your own homophobia.
Woah, hold it buddy.
Nothing that I said in this thread can rationally paint me as Homophobic, but actually the opposite.
You should watch what you're typing or you'll have to deal with the consequences of your own words, turd.
Of course, you only care about the individual efficiency of our soldiers right? So you believe sexual distractions are not good, right?
I believe that it's not right for the military, even if its harm is minimal.
So you propose separating men based on sexuality and putting them in a shower together so as to "lessen sexual distraction", because putting a gay in a shower full of gays would do exactly that, right?
Avoid repeating yourself, I have already answered that one above.
Exactly.
It just boils down to the fact you cant bear to think about another guy checking your arse out in the shower.
Either way they will be distracted. Why the uneccessary discrimination?
Again, watch your words.
Since this was in the same post, I'll refuse to report on it.
But the next time you'll decide to accuse me or anyone else in something that we're not, you will, as I said, suffer from the consequences.