- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
You are personally involved in discussing the dishonesty of Fox in a thread where that dishonesty was used to then dishonestly lead into saying that there were zero problems with fracking. You don't get to take 'your' conversation out of the context of the thread in which it is occurring. He is not going to admit to you of Fox's dishonesty without also using deflection himself because he is having to account for not just your dialogue, but also the context in which it is occurring. And rightly so. There is no reason to give ground based on such dishonesty.
No one is saying that there are ZERO risks involved. We're just pointing out that the problems that are being presented are impossible. Come up with something realistic. You have a poster insisting that fracing is being done IN aquafers and that just isn't happening. I'm not going to call anyone a liar, just very, very, very uninformed.