Boo Radley
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 37,066
- Reaction score
- 7,028
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
I think when you spend on national security it is indeed fine but when you spend on social programs that is over the line even though politicians have that right. I would call spending 500 billion more a year is putting spending on steroids but guess liberals have a different opinion. Liberals have never seen a dollar that they wouldn't spend creating dependence.
First, iraq had little to nothing to do with national security. Imperialism is not equal to national security. Secondly, all his spending was not war spending. Personally, I would prefer spending that help our people, and not spending which is thrown down a rat hole. Now, that's another issue, so please no more squirrels. Focus. Admit that Bush spent plenty. That you really won't run around bad mouthing a republican for no other reason than he is a republican.