- Joined
- Jun 13, 2010
- Messages
- 22,676
- Reaction score
- 4,282
- Location
- DC Metro
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Nope, most sex offenders aren't child offenders anyways. Certainly, most are not pedophiles.
Bull..........
Nope, most sex offenders aren't child offenders anyways. Certainly, most are not pedophiles.
Don't worry, be happy you've been reported! =)
Lame..........
He got a little vacation to think about his numerous personal attacks. I haven't attacked anyone on this thread. If I had, I would have most CERTAINLY been infracted for it.
Why don't you try your best to keep on topic and not make this thread about me, k?
They're shouldn't be a SINGLE person on the registry for this. Do you have any idea how much it costs tax payers to follow one offender for a year? You're acceptance of an "ok" levels of dead innocent people and teenage sex offenders is disturbing.
He got a little vacation to think about his numerous personal attacks. I haven't attacked anyone on this thread. If I had, I would have most CERTAINLY been infracted for it.
Why don't you try your best to keep on topic and not make this thread about me, k? I could easily report tons of posts on here as personal attacks. It's all you guys on the right have. You can't dispute anything I say. I post links, with facts and sources, in response you attack me, call me a sex offender lover, an idiot, and a host of other wonderful infractable things. I've kept this conversation on a very adult level, even if my competition has not. I have a history of not following the rules around here, but I'm trying my best to. I can see the mods are coming through for me and taking care of business.
You attack me personally, in any way, shape or form, and I will report you. I didn't used to, but I will now. When responding to attacks gets you a two week vacation but reporting them only gets THEM a 2 week vacation, I'm all for the latter.
Thanks, guys and gals.
You repeatedly attack people, as you did in this very post. I am sure that I am on your ignore list, and that is telling enough... but please explain why you think that child molesters and rapists should not receive a Scarlet Letter on Megan's List?
Getting things back on track here:
Only four sexual assault suspects remain in jail - Houston Community Newspapers: News: sexual assault,
Cleveland residents still reeling after gang rape of girl, 11 | Top stories | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle
The first mentions the criminal records of some of the alleged rapists and the second mentions a number of fact surrounding the case and the alleged victim.
I'm pretty sure she was a victim. "Alleged" carries with it an assumption that there is definite doubt. Whether or not each individual is guilty or not, something bad went on inside that trailer that she honestly did not want nor deserve. She is definitely a victim, DOL.
No, alleged means their crimes have not yet been proven in court.
No, alleged means their crimes have not yet been proven in court.
Not that I agree in anyway with how you seem to have twisted this to a racial issue - but it's too late for Sharpton and Jackson.. The New Black Panther Party beat them to the punch
"Quanell X, leader of the Black Panther movement in Houston - a mere 45 miles away - told ABC News: 'Every adult male that had sex with this child should go to prison, I don't care what the colour is.
'But I do not believe black males are the only ones that had contact with this young child. It appears to me there's only been the selective prosecution of one community, which is African-American"
Read more: Horrific gang rape by 18 men of girl, 11, in Texas sparks racial tension | Mail Online
Read what I wrote, not what you think I wrote.
I said "alleged" means there is doubt. Not proven in court means "not guilty" right now. But I was not referring to the perps, only her being a victim. He said "alleged victim" and I said that I honestly believe she was a victim, the "alleged" part is incorrect. You don't prove in court if someone is a victim.
It doesn't mean there is doubt. In America someone is always innocent (even when cought red handed) until proven guilty in court. In our system of law, not saying alleged before guilt is proven in court can lead to slander charges, that does not mean there is doubt.
Again you're speaking of the perps I'm talking about the victim.
The alleged victim? Is that what you're getting at? That the victim-ness of the victim is in doubt? Seriously?
The alleged victim? Is that what you're getting at? That the victim-ness of the victim is in doubt? Seriously?
I'm pretty sure she was a victim. "Alleged" carries with it an assumption that there is definite doubt. Whether or not each individual is guilty or not, something bad went on inside that trailer that she honestly did not want nor deserve. She is definitely a victim, DOL.
it would help if you read the story before making stupid comments.
the accused are not white.
I just cannot understand those who are blaming the victim and defending the perpetrators unless they are trying to rationalize something in their own experience.
.
No!!!!! That the victimness of the victim is NOT in doubt!!! Damn dude!!! Stop trying to make me out to be a villain and read what is written!!!!
I'm pretty sure she was a victim.
"Alleged" carries with it an assumption that there is definite doubt.
Whether or not each individual is guilty or not, something bad went on inside that trailer that she honestly did not want nor deserve.
She is definitely a victim, DOL.
I attacked no one. If you think I did, report me. Nothing stopping you, is there?
You're already showing your ignorance. There is no "megans list." There is a megans law. There is an adam walsh act. A "jessicas law". With the excepton of Megan, there are some HUGE holes in the crimes that created the jessicas law and adam walsh act.
However, to answer your question, since it was a good question, I actually do think they should be put on a list. I just don't think that list should be in the publics hands. Obviously they can't handle it.
Now, will you answer this question for me. Why haven't you addressed anything I spoke of earlier, the vigilante violence on sex offenders, the harassment of the offender and their family, etc? Do you not care about ALL children, or just "some"? What about the kids of these offenders? Do you not care that they are humiliated and yet they are innocent? What about the wives, girlfriends, parents, etc?
And you keep saying "child molesters and rapists" but that's not sex offenders. Thats child molesters and rapist. Someone that downloads photos is neither, someone that pees behind a tree is neither, someone that is 18 with a 17yo girlfriend (YES, in Arizona that will get you on the list) is neither, so make sure you specify child molester and rapist, don't say sex offender, because that's too "all inclusive."
And no, you're not on ignore. I just told you not to contact me via PM. I haven't put anyone on ignore. No reason to. It makes threads too hard to follow if you do that. Only in extreme cases would I do that. I think on 12 forums I'm a member of maybe 1 person has been put on ignore. None on this site
I'm pretty sure she was a victim.
Meaning: it's possible she's not.
Debatable, and reporting people is for sissies...