- Joined
- Sep 7, 2010
- Messages
- 26,526
- Reaction score
- 9,462
- Location
- Alabama
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
You ever see someone that had a dose of clap in their throat?
:vomit: I knew a girl in HS that got jock itch around her mouth.
You ever see someone that had a dose of clap in their throat?
tell that to my wife :lol:
It's pretty much common sense in the gay community. Oral sex and masturbation have low riskss for HIV transmission and anal sex has high risks. Therefore, approximately half of gay men simply don't have anal sex. Not to mention a hell of a lot of gay men find the act disgusting and prefer frotting or other sexual practices. I met one not long ago who said he was totally turned off by the idea of fecal matter around his penis.
Anywho, anal sex is in no way a prerequisite to being a gay man.
Anal sex is more a heterosexual thing than a homosexual one.
Masturbation yeah but not oral sex...where you have and orfice (the mouth) you can catch AIDS as well as other STDs which I already mentioned..Masturbation is absteinence...Of course you won't get infected that way......
.Like I said tha anus is designed to export body waste..............
Being followed to the shower?
Actually, HIV is bloodborn. You need an open sore in order for it to transmit. Saliva is caustic to the virus. The CDC has established estimates on this. They say per 10,000 exposures to an infected source of receptive anal sex, approximately 200 will be infected. Whereas per 10,000 exposures to an iinfected source of oral sex, approximately 1 will be infected.
If you don't have any open sores in your mouth, it is extremely unlikely that you will contract HIV from giving or recieiving oral sex.
since HIV is still pretty much a death sentence, I don't think it would be worth the risk.
Those statistics are based on urban centers in the industrialized world in the 90's before the advent of many of the most effective antiviral treatments for HIV.
And if you want to be technical, they measure the life expectancy of people infected with HIV, not gays. I could take a sample of people in Uganda and argue that black women have a life expectancy of 10-20 years less. It doesn't make it true.
since HIV is still pretty much a death sentence, I don't think it would be worth the risk.
actually your wrong...................It was that way when AIDS was at its height but now with ways to combat it gay young men are going back to their old ways of unprotected sex and daisy chains in bath houses in the Peoples Republic of San francisco snd Seattle............
I would assume they're as truthful as your military dudes are going to be with the Pentagon survey regarding DADT.
As for refuting your latter statement, I have no interest in refuting it since it is irrelevant.
the survey being given is a whole different ball game.It does not refer to ones personal beahvior........
That, unfortunately, is true. The introduction of antivirals have lead to skyrocketing unprotected sex rates among the urban homosexual population.
Actually, HIV is bloodborn. You need an open sore in order for it to transmit. Saliva is caustic to the virus. The CDC has established estimates on this. They say per 10,000 exposures to an infected source of receptive anal sex, approximately 200 will be infected. Whereas per 10,000 exposures to an iinfected source of oral sex, approximately 1 will be infected.
If you don't have any open sores in your mouth, it is extremely unlikely that you will contract HIV from giving or recieiving oral sex.
It needs a wet orfice like the mouth, vagina or anus to cultivate.......That is why a straight man engaged in straight sex with a condom is less likely to catch AIDS then anyone else...............
It has more functions then that and I think you know that.....The anus only has one function............So is the penis.
so what is it? are young gay men just incredibly stupid or what? given the fact that the HIV rate among gays is much higher than average, why risk unprotected sex?
It has more functions then that and I think you know that.....The anus only has one function............
at the moment none thatn God and that is the way I want it...........
No.... it needs access to the bloodstream. That's it. You could rub HIV all over someone's twat and as long as there aren't any open sores/cuts/scratches/etc, it isn't going to enter the bloodstream and infect them.
It needs a wet orfice like the mouth, vagina or anus to cultivate.......That is why a straight man engaged in straight sex with a condom is less likely to catch AIDS then anyone else...............
That, unfortunately, is true. The introduction of antivirals have lead to skyrocketing unprotected sex rates among the urban homosexual population.
But my point still stands. You can selectively take a sample anywhere and make it show a segment of the population has significantly lower life expectancy. However, a gay man in backwoods Nebraska probably would have a much higher life expectancy than one in San Fransisco California simply because the primary behaviors that lead to lowered life expectancy are promiscuity and unprotected anal sex not being gay.
It's dangerous and it is much, much better if you are in a long term, committed relationshiip, but those are hard to come by in the current political climate.