MusicAdventurer
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2011
- Messages
- 1,034
- Reaction score
- 268
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
I understand perfectly-you want people to pay based on their ability (from each according to their ability). I reject that. If you receive the same value you ought to pay the same but I will accept paying the same percentage even if that means the second guy pays many times more for the same value
Also, I don't want people to pay according to their ability ... I just don't see the point in taxing those who have no money to be taxed ... how is that going to help anything? I am looking at the big picture, taxing those who have nothing will only keep them in poverty ... what is your reasoning to taxing those who have nothing? what do we gain from it? what utility does it have?
Last edited: