- Joined
- Nov 14, 2009
- Messages
- 23,956
- Reaction score
- 19,694
- Location
- Rocky Mtn. High
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Good point, but this was a special election, which is usually characterized by lower turnout than a scheduled election. That characterization of special elections is they tend to be more single issue driven.The winner last night got over 2000 fewer votes than she did when she lost in 2022.
Its not dumb at all .... special elections are usually "canary in coal mine" events. You should not overplay their significance (as I pointed out above, they are more typically single issue voters), but you shouldn't underplay them either (because you can see what is motivating people more clearly in advance of the election) as history shows they are typically leading indicators. It seems that the woman's rights issues, which have turned out the vote pretty significantly in the past couple of years, must be well considered by the candidates heading into the general. If either side dismisses what they have been seeing the past few years, they will do so at their own peril.Yes, that is my point.
It is dumb to compare a special election to a presidential election.
Election polls have two components to them. The first component is the preference poll, which is usually pretty easy to nail. The second component is the turnout model; who will actually act on their preference on a date certain. To me, its the turnout model they haven't been able to get right.Said it before and I'll say it again: the polls are flawed. They overrepresent older demographics when voters are getting younger and younger.
But I hope our MAGA Republican friends continue to hyper-focus on polling data as if they're actual votes. Just makes beating them in elections all the sweeter.
Last edited: