The current political process is a joke and I pray to every god and goddess there is that you understand that.
I understand perfectly that the Democrats have done every possible thing they can imagine to corrupt the process.
Early voting.
Universal absentee voting
Motor voter registration.
Opposing any and all efforts to demand verification of citizenship of prospective registered voters.
Opposing any and all efforts to demand the presentation of lawful ID at the polls.
Opposition to basic literacy requirements.
ANYTHING and EVERYTHING the Democrats can do to corrupt elections, they've been doing.
Yes, I'm FULLY aware of the problems with the American electoral process.
What do you do if people get power-hungry, can you force the group out of power if that happens and who does the forcing?
What group? Under the scenario I presented, the office holders are chosen from the candidate pool randomly, for a fixed term. Then they get to go back to their civillian life and live under the laws they passed.
Naturally, there will still be a written constitution with specifcally enumerated powers and a specifc bill of rights. I mean, the US Constitution, when followed, provides the most secure guarantees of individual liberty in human history.
If you're referring to the nonsense we have today, it's becoming increasingly clear that the brick and stone walls in Washington could be put to better use with firing squads in front of them.
What do you do if you get one egocentric jackass that holds procedures up because he's enjoying the power?
You mean like when Patrick Leahy deliberately stonewalled Bush judicial appointees simply because Bush was a Republican and might nominate judges that believe the Constitution is a limit on goverment?
The word is "term limits" and an end to arrogance.
Humans have a natural tendency to "clique", what's to stop cliques among these random people from impairing their judgement?
What's to stop Obama from hitting the links?
Nothing.
What's to stop government office holders from developing an us vs them attitude?
Term limits.
How do you ensure you dont accidentally end up selecting a group of all one particular political persuasion, which in America isnt terribly unlikely?
Amazing thing about the word random. It keeps people from selecting.
What do you do if groups start counter-manding each other or trying to undo the work that one group just did because they disagree with it?
I have no idea what kind of weird power structure you're pretending to see.
And, frankly, I WANT the Republican to not only demolish the edifice of socialism built in this nation by the evil Progressives, but I demand they bury the corpse of socialism in the world's deepest salt bed.
So, you're saying there's something wrong with undoing the efforts of preceding office holders?
I say we have to fix the mistakes of the past and replace the socialists with Americans.
I'm not opposed to it, but I am somewhat skeptical. Again, I would want to see the idea piloted in a major city or even a state before I would start gelling into being for or against it.
The method I proposed violates significant portions of the US Constitution and will not be implented, ever, anywhere.