Daktoria
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2011
- Messages
- 3,245
- Reaction score
- 397
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Private
Why would workers A, B, and C have the right to negotiation a contract on behalf of workers D and E who are not interested in the union and want to negotiate their own contract? What makes workers A, B, and C think that they are somehow in control of what workers D and E do? And where is the government in all this? Why doesn't the government protect workers D and E?
Centinel, that's the exact point. The government doesn't want to protect D and E. It also wants the union to be able to act as quickly as possible such that it doesn't have to educate all of its members. That way, inner organizational strife is kept down to a minimum, and people have to "just trust" senior officers in charge.
Instead, the government wants the union to be as corrupt as possible so it can charge as much as it wants in contracts for wages.
That way, the government can justify levying higher taxes, and continue to crowd out private enterprise.
Last edited: