- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: Cop Suspended After Arrests At Teen Pool Party
He had every right to detain to investigative purposes.
It was justified.
Her failure to comply was doing wrong. Then she resisted.
So just stop you clearly have no idea of what you speak.
Each action that were discussing was justified.
He ran after the kids who took off instead of following his orders.
The other points were already mentioned.
The only emotions present was his swearing.
Everything else was justified. Again, show it wasn't. The Chief surely hasn't. So how about you?
Just stop. You have no idea of what you speak and are wrong.They only thing they did was walk away because he had no reason to detain them.
He had every right to detain to investigative purposes.
Wrong. He pulled his firearm out and had it at ready in response to an aggressive 19 year old male.He pulled a gun on unarmed children.
It was justified.
:dohHe used force to restrain a child who he had no reason to believe was doing anything wrong.
Her failure to comply was doing wrong. Then she resisted.
So just stop you clearly have no idea of what you speak.
No you show me where his actions were prohibited.Show me where in his policy, protocol or training
You are making assuptions and then compounding your error with exaggeration.an officer should show up at a relatively calm scene and pull guns and use force on kids,
Each action that were discussing was justified.
He ran after the kids who took off instead of following his orders.
The other points were already mentioned.
The false claims of racism is what did that.and turn what should have been a very simple issue into a national media event.
No, you were asked to show the violations. Until you do you can not claim they were any violations.Show me where in his policy, protocol or training it says and officer should let his emotions take control and should overreact to a situation because he feels disrespected by teens. Show me where in his policy, protocol or training it says he can do whatever he wants to whoever he wants because he is a cop and rules dont apply to him.
The only emotions present was his swearing.
Everything else was justified. Again, show it wasn't. The Chief surely hasn't. So how about you?