Clinton emails had intel from most secretive, classified programs

[Conservative]

Inspector General: Clinton emails had intel from most secretive, classified programs | Fox News

Please people, explain to me how anyone can support someone so incompetent, illegal, immoral, and with no distinguishable positive results from the various positions she has held.

 

[Glen Contrarian]

Inspector General: Clinton emails had intel from most secretive, classified programs | Fox News

Please people, explain to me how anyone can support someone so incompetent, illegal, immoral, and with no distinguishable positive results from the various positions she has held.

Hey, whaddaya know? Y'all mighta finally got her...but of course we still have to see how it all pans out, and get all sides of the story (which, of course, has never been high on the DP conservatives' list of priorities).

That said, that's not really a problem - because if she goes away, Bernie still beats any GOP candidate out there.

 

[Conservative]

Hey, whaddaya know? Y'all mighta finally got her...but of course we still have to see how it all pans out, and get all sides of the story (which, of course, has never been high on the DP conservatives' list of priorities).

That said, that's not really a problem - because if she goes away, Bernie still beats any GOP candidate out there.

What I find quite telling is how many people like Hillary without even looking at the results in her resume. Why does it take this action to change the minds of people like you? You want badly to believe the liberal ideology but ignore the liberal results buying the rhetoric instead of the substance.

Liberalism is a serious problem in today's society as it has created an entitlement mentality taking away personal responsibility from everyone it infects.

 

[justabubba]

looking forward to seeing more about the nexus between the donations to the clinton foundation and access to state department officials and/or contracts

question: is Bernie going to name O'Malley or Elizabeth Warren as his running mate?

 

[Glen Contrarian]

looking forward to seeing more about the nexus between the donations to the clinton foundation and access to state department officials and/or contracts

question: is Bernie going to name O'Malley or Elizabeth Warren as his running mate?

I hope it's Michelle Obama - I'd like nothing better than to watch the right wing freak out for another eight years...especially if anything happened to jolly ol' Bernie....

 

[Fenton]

Hey, whaddaya know? Y'all mighta finally got her...but of course we still have to see how it all pans out, and get all sides of the story (which, of course, has never been high on the DP conservatives' list of priorities).

That said, that's not really a problem - because if she goes away, Bernie still beats any GOP candidate out there.

Actually no.

If Bernie Sanders is the Democrat candidate that means people other than his supporters will have to pay attention to his nonsense.

. People have no idea just how economically incompetent he is because they're not paying any attention.

Right now he has the benefit of the naivete of his supporters but that won't last if he gets the nomination.

 

[Glen Contrarian]

Actually no.

If Bernie Sanders is the Democrat candidate that means people other than his supporters will have to pay attention to his nonsense.

. People have no idea just how economically incompetent he is because they're not paying any attention.

Right now he has the benefit of the naivete of his supporters but that won't last if he gets the nomination.

Funny how the same kinds of things were said about some guy named Obama. How'd that work out for y'all?

 

[roughdraft274]

People are willing to overlook incredibly ineptitude of a given situation by a politician that they agree with politically. It's the nature of the game.

Kind of like how conservatives call Hillary immoral and question her resume when in reality if she were a die hard conservative with the exact same history and past (same positions, stayed with a husband who cheated) we wouldn't be hearing hardly any of it from that side of the isle, but would hear incredible vitriol from most lefties.

 

[Conservative]

Funny how the same kinds of things were said about some guy named Obama. How'd that work out for y'all?

For the 15 plus million unemployed/under employed/discouraged, the taxpayers funding the current 18.8 Trillion dollar debt and a world in fire not so well

 

[Fenton]

Funny how the same kinds of things were said about some guy named Obama. How'd that work out for y'all?

And millions Americans have experienced the consequences of that and that's lead to GOP routes in the Midterms.

Or have you not been paying attention ??

Sanders plan to " Move America forward " is worse than anything Obama's proposed and when people are forced to pay attention to his Socialist clap trap they'll run like hell.

His plan to fix the economy is massive New Federal spending " Stimulus " while simultaneously driving away private sector investment via tax increases on " the Rich ".

Lol !!!

He's a Socialist, its his and other leftist one trick pony because that's all they know how to do when it comes to growing market based economies that they do not comprehend.

 

[Glen Contrarian]

For the 15 plus million unemployed/under employed/discouraged, the taxpayers funding the current 18.8 Trillion dollar debt and a world in fire not so well

As compared to the crap sandwich he was handed on his first day on the job? I'm happy he was there.

Ah, but I forget - in Right Wing Wacko World, he shoulda been able to snap his fingers and make everything all better in just a few days - even though he was facing more obstruction by the other party than has any president since Lincoln. And because he wasn't able to make everything all better in a few days, well, THAT means he was a complete and utter failure!

Hm. Sixty-odd consecutive months of private-sector job growth - the longest such period in all American history, something that NO other president can claim...but I get it - a complete and utter failure, mm-hmm....

 

[Conservative]

Glen Contrarian;1065475970]As compared to the crap sandwich he was handed on his first day on the job? I'm happy he was there.

Don't know how many times we have to go over this but Obama was part of the Congress that gave us that "crap sandwich" and what he did was put ketchup and mustard on it to make the results look better than they are knowing that good little soldiers like you will buy the rhetoric because that is what you want to believe. How in the world good people can be so passionate and yet ignorant about the results are quite stunning

Ah, but I forget - in Right Wing Wacko World, he shoulda been able to snap his fingers and make everything all better in just a few days - even though he was facing more obstruction by the other party than has any president since Lincoln. And because he wasn't able to make everything all better in a few days, well, THAT means he was a complete and utter failure!

Obama had total control of the Congress thus the purse strings and legislative process. He signed the 2009 budget, recycled the TARP repayments, signed his own stimulus program knowing that people like you would continue to blame Bush for the end results and true to form you did that. In case you forgot that stimulus was for shovel ready jobs but what he did was bail out unions and rather than create jobs took employment from 142 million in January 2009 to 139 million in January 2011. I would have blamed Bush for the results too were it not for the shovel ready job stimulus

Hm. Sixty-odd consecutive months of private-sector job growth - the longest such period in all American history, something that NO other president can claim...but I get it - a complete and utter failure, mm-hmm....

Would love to hear the policies Obama implemented that created those private level jobs. I can point to the Reagan policies and the Bush policies that generated jobs but for some reason you cannot do the same for Obama. You see, you ignore that Reagan implemented a stimulus program with NO spending and created almost 17 million jobs. Bush created over 9 million jobs between January 2001 and January 2008. Obama has created 7 million jobs since taking office at a cost of 8.2 trillion added to the debt. To you is that a success? Why don't you care about the debt exceeding our GDP?

 

[Fenton]

As compared to the crap sandwich he was handed on his first day on the job? I'm happy he was there.

Ah, but I forget - in Right Wing Wacko World, he shoulda been able to snap his fingers and make everything all better in just a few days - even though he was facing more obstruction by the other party than has any president since Lincoln. And because he wasn't able to make everything all better in a few days, well, THAT means he was a complete and utter failure!

Hm. Sixty-odd consecutive months of private-sector job growth - the longest such period in all American history, something that NO other president can claim...but I get it - a complete and utter failure, mm-hmm....

Sixty-odd consecutive months of private sector growth ? Sounds like the FED didn't need to drive interest rates down to nothing for the last 7 years after all.

What a over-reaction, right ? That's some accomplishment you've described there. Thing is I don't remember any Democrat Politicians running in the 2014 Midterms mentioning it.

I wonder why. I'm guessing they decided against mentioning it because they realized their voters weren't complete imbeciles. The same reason why they refused to bring up ObamaCare as a " accomplishment ".

Not only did they not bring up the ACA, they pretended that it didn't exist all together. But hey if you say it's a accomplishment worth noting then I believe you.

And no snapping your fingers even if you are the President will not lead to a actual economic recovery. Intelligent policies that incentivize private sector investment is what leads to recoveries.

Forcing Americans to purchase a increasingly expensive Government created product that was sold under false pretenses, pulling the largest bait and switch scam in US History is NOT how you create economic growth.

That's how you throw a huge wet blanket on the American economy and guarantee the lack of any real recovery. Raising Capital Gains is also a bad idea when your'e trying to grow a economy.

Heck, even Clinton lowered Capital Gains.

 

[NonoBadDog]

Inspector General: Clinton emails had intel from most secretive, classified programs | Fox News

Please people, explain to me how anyone can support someone so incompetent, illegal, immoral, and with no distinguishable positive results from the various positions she has held.

I can't explain it. I have read several posts where people says she has experience. If they declared me a doctor tomorrow and I killed 20 people in surgery I would have "experience" I guess.

 

[Velvet Elvis]

Please people, explain to me how anyone can support someone so incompetent, illegal, immoral, and with no distinguishable positive results from the various positions she has held.

There's a large contingency of people who would vote "democrat" regardless of whether they ever heard or seen their own candidate.

Adolf Hitler would have a legitimate shot at the White House, if he were the democrat primary winner.
Charles Manson would be a serious candidate.
Kim Kardashian would be a shoo-in, if only she were old enough.

Right now, they just have to choose between a liar, a socialist, and a piece of wood that they prop up during debates.

 

[Vern]

Inspector General: Clinton emails had intel from most secretive, classified programs | Fox News

Please people, explain to me how anyone can support someone so incompetent, illegal, immoral, and with no distinguishable positive results from the various positions she has held.

am I the only person here that knows that Hillary is not under investigation for receiving emails that were later classified? Of course the fox article isn't going to say that because they have an agenda. But if you read the link carefully, Fox is already implanting the back up narrative of "there is no way she couldn't know". so when no charges are brought against Hillary, you'll be able to believe its because of corruption. And of course the back up narrative is from an unnamed source. I think we've learned not to trust fox's unnamed sources. We have 8 Benghazi investigations to prove it.

 

[justabubba]

am I the only person here that knows that Hillary is not under investigation for receiving emails that were later classified? Of course the fox article isn't going to say that because they have an agenda. But if you read the link carefully, Fox is already implanting the back up narrative of "there is no way she couldn't know". so when no charges are brought against Hillary, you'll be able to believe its because of corruption. And of course the back up narrative is from an unnamed source. I think we've learned not to trust fox's unnamed sources. We have 8 Benghazi investigations to prove it.

this late in the game, you may be the last person still believing that ruse which pretends the confidential materials within hillary's emails were only classified after she had received the transmission

 

[Conservative]

am I the only person here that knows that Hillary is not under investigation for receiving emails that were later classified? Of course the fox article isn't going to say that because they have an agenda. But if you read the link carefully, Fox is already implanting the back up narrative of "there is no way she couldn't know". so when no charges are brought against Hillary, you'll be able to believe its because of corruption. And of course the back up narrative is from an unnamed source. I think we've learned not to trust fox's unnamed sources. We have 8 Benghazi investigations to prove it.

Once again how did I know that one of the most partisan political hacks in this forum would step up to support Hillary? Here is an individual who doesn't understand results, buys the D after Hillary's name, cannot explain how the stimulus impacted the Stock Market, has posted no actual accomplishments of Hillary but because she is a Democrat will support her regardless of her past and poor performance in all jobs she has held.

 

[Vern]

this late in the game, you may be the last person still believing that ruse which pretends the confidential materials within hillary's emails were only classified after she had received the transmission

to be fair, I haven't seen anything that says otherwise. Is that no longer the case? the fox article cleary tries to convey that message but then it starts with the "she should have known" narrative.

 

[Ikari]

Funny how the same kinds of things were said about some guy named Obama. How'd that work out for y'all?

Not well for America. But Republocrat Corporate Politicians aren't good for America in general.

 

[imyoda]

And let us remember all this “information”/” leaks are coming from………………the “Don’t let any smear go unused” discredited” from members of that politically biased selective committee…that even GOP’ers complain about as being a waste of the taxpayer’s money

"The classified material included in the latest batch of Hillary Clinton emails flagged by an internal watchdog involved discussions of CIA drone strikes, which are among the worst kept secrets in Washington, senior U.S. officials briefed on the matter tell NBC News."

"The description of the emails as relatively innocuous came from officials, including a senior U.S. intelligence official, who believe Inspector General McCullough has been unfair to Clinton in his handling of the issue. They say McCullough and Congressional Republicans have elevated a mundane dispute about classification into a scandal.

They point out that McCullough, a career intelligence official, contributed $1,000 to George W. Bush's 2004 presidential campaign."
Officials: New Top Secret Clinton Emails '''Innocuous''' - NBC News

 

[NonoBadDog]

am I the only person here that knows that Hillary is not under investigation for receiving emails that were later classified? Of course the fox article isn't going to say that because they have an agenda. But if you read the link carefully, Fox is already implanting the back up narrative of "there is no way she couldn't know". so when no charges are brought against Hillary, you'll be able to believe its because of corruption. And of course the back up narrative is from an unnamed source. I think we've learned not to trust fox's unnamed sources. We have 8 Benghazi investigations to prove it.

Yeah, nobody else is in that little world of yours.

 

[NonoBadDog]

And let us remember all this “information”/” leaks are coming from………………the “Don’t let any smear go unused” discredited” from members of that politically biased selective committee…that even GOP’ers complain about as being a waste of the taxpayer’s money

"The classified material included in the latest batch of Hillary Clinton emails flagged by an internal watchdog involved discussions of CIA drone strikes, which are among the worst kept secrets in Washington, senior U.S. officials briefed on the matter tell NBC News."

"The description of the emails as relatively innocuous came from officials, including a senior U.S. intelligence official, who believe Inspector General McCullough has been unfair to Clinton in his handling of the issue. They say McCullough and Congressional Republicans have elevated a mundane dispute about classification into a scandal.

They point out that McCullough, a career intelligence official, contributed $1,000 to George W. Bush's 2004 presidential campaign."
Officials: New Top Secret Clinton Emails '''Innocuous''' - NBC News

Can't refute the evidence. Interesting. Hack post.

 

[imyoda]

Can't refute the evidence. Interesting. Hack post.

And what evidence are you are talking about?

Can you please let us all know what you are referring to?

 

[NonoBadDog]

And what evidence are you are talking about?

Can you please let us all know what you are referring to?

The evidence you quoted:

"The classified material included in the latest batch of Hillary Clinton emails flagged by an internal watchdog involved discussions of CIA drone strikes, which are among the worst kept secrets in Washington, senior U.S. officials briefed on the matter tell NBC News."

"The description of the emails as relatively innocuous came from officials, including a senior U.S. intelligence official, who believe Inspector General McCullough has been unfair to Clinton in his handling of the issue. They say McCullough and Congressional Republicans have elevated a mundane dispute about classification into a scandal.

You complained about smearing Shrillary then you quoted that. Then you, ironically, smeared the source. I guess you have two standards. It even gave me a chuckle. That is pretty hypocritical. You NEVER refuted the accusation but you were quick to accuse someone of smearing just before you started smearing him. I think that is what they call "diversion".