- Joined
- Sep 13, 2011
- Messages
- 3,491
- Reaction score
- 2,546
- Location
- Lafayette, Louisiana
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
You have provided not a shred of evidence Germany owns the property or that it is responsible for maintenance and I have linked the evidence the tax is not State mandated and that Germany does not own the church property.
At this point, you can either provide the evidence backing up your claim, admit you were wrong, or leave the thread.
To be fair Napoleon, Furiounova is right. None of the information about German church taxes that I can find indicates that the reason is because the state owns the churches. As far as I can discern, the church tax is a very old custom from when local officials paid for church maintenance and salaries.
In my opinion, this is a tempest in a tea pot, it merely re-affirms what has existed in law for centuries. But anti-Catholics use any fodder they can find to fashion into a whip.
Why does anyone think the church should be obligated to perform sacramental rites for those who refuse to support the church? If you care about being in communion with the church, then you should care about supporting it. Jesus called blessed the poor woman who gave two pennies, all she had, to maintain the temple, because maintaining her church was so important to her. If some people in Germany see fit not to pay the tax, then I feel the church has no obligation to accept them in to communion.
Like a person who lapsed on their dues to the Atheist society demanding to get in to the annual banquet and complaining that they stopped sending the quarterly newsletter.