- Joined
- Sep 7, 2010
- Messages
- 26,526
- Reaction score
- 9,462
- Location
- Alabama
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
How childish.
yes, you are.
How childish.
apparently, since she was "not guilty" and didn't kill her child, to her knowledge the kid wasn't dead...just "missing". not reporting that your child is missing is neglect, which qualifies as child abuse.
I'm lead to believe that your statement would be in response to the closing sentence of my post? In response the Jury did not find her Guilty either, and until proven guilty, her innocence is protected under the Law! Therefore, further prosecution by the Public, and Media is making her a Victim. If you had evidence that she committed murder you should have reported it! If you have no such evidence then your assertions of guilt hold as much water as the Prosecutions.
So you think it's possible to abuse a dead child
and you think abuse is the same as neglect?
can't you read? I said nothing about the child being dead...only missing
Can't you think? That child *IS* dead.
allegedly, she didn't know that at the time. that's the point.
if she knew the kid was dead: GUILTY of failure to report a death
if she didn't know the kid was dead: GUILTY of abuse via neglect
sometimes it really is that simple
Then the state should have charged her correctly instead of with murder 1. Sometimes it really is that simple.
who said they shouldn't have?
who said they shouldn't have?
I'm sorry, the coroner should be fired.
If there was a drop of chlorine in her lungs, that would show drowing as a cause of death.
was the skull x-rayed? was the whole body x-rayed? did they find ANY breaks in the bones anywhere?
what about the skin? was there any sign of trauma?
did they check under the kid's nails for skin?
That was one of Thunders larger gems of incredibly uninformed commentary.This post, so filled with misunderstanding of the situation it addresses, might have been answered by others, but I'm so gobsmacked that I can't let myself go past it without answering:
There were no lungs. The lungs, like every other body organ, had long since disolved into nothingness.
The salvaged bones, those that hadn't been carted off by scavengers, were thoroughly examined and showed no sign of trauma beyond being gnawed upon by animals.
There was no skin. It, too, had disolved along with the organs, blood and tissue into nothingness.
The child had no fingernails. She had no skin. She may not have even had the skeletal remains of both hands. One cannot check under the fingernails of a skeleton, because skeleton's do... not... have... fingernails.
I mean, :shock:
That's cause it's a somewhat attractive middle class female being charged. No one would give a crap if it was Fat hairy 'Ol Joe Nelson from Memphis, Or Shaniqua Cosby from Harlem. Average joes are boring. We can blame America's obsession with this case on none other than the media. Same as every event that has a large American following.Funny how people are crying and are up in arms over this case but couldn't care less about other kids dying or being killed.
I find this case to be some of the worst social pornography I have ever seen and the people bawling their eyes out and are upset over the outcome, need to see a shrink - they have serious issues themselves.
That was one of Thunders larger gems of incredibly uninformed commentary.
in other words, you don't know which means saying she killed her with certainty is nonsensical.
Yes, he obviously didn't read the autopsy report.
if you killed your child, and you know where she is, she's not missing. so wouldn't reporting her missing being lying to leo?
Why doesn't matter. The Constitution prohibits the govt from forcing testimony from a citizen that can be used against them.
you clearly know very little about the law.
You can not say that if no crime was committed. They do not make laws because criminals may lie. Criminals will lie no matter what the law.
So whats your point? How would you do things differently?
What things? States are making Caylee laws to try and fix the fact parents do not have to report children missing.
'Caylee's Law' proposals follow Casey Anthony verdict