yeah but you made the same mistake that other poster did, you looked at global statistics. Tex posted the relevant graph, and to what it was I was referring last night. Ok, so I got sloppy, it was late and I was tired. I don't normally make a claim like that with providing a link. It slipped my mind, as my attention was on the legal aspects being brought out in this thread. The comment about HIV was unimportant in the grand scheme.
Look, if you and the others wishing to make this into 20 pages about statistical analysis I'd be happy to join a separate thread on it. I have experience with statistics ya know, and would love to share it with y'all..
But, in the interest of moving this thread forward on the central issue, can we please disregard the HIV coment for now?
Pretty please with sugar on top?
CC, you have no idea how wrong you are about the "HIV" thing.. But like I said, if you really and truly believe that my analysis of those statistics is wrong, then start another thread on it. I already gave you the answer, but hey, if that makes no sense to you then have at er.. I'll clarify more for you, and the others..
Just so we're clear though, when and if I do reply to your posts in my absence, I am directly being challenged to refute your argument that you posted in 4/4/2009, correct?
Tim-
Tim-