- Joined
- Jul 12, 2005
- Messages
- 36,913
- Reaction score
- 11,283
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Weak pal, very weak. When you say "scoff", what you really mean is that you have no logical reason to deny any marriage between 100 people if they so choose. To do so exposes the weakness of the "gay marriage as a fundamanetal right's", issue.
You're not fooling anyone..
Tim-
Actually, pal, the argument is clear if you know anything about the case law surrounding marriage. First and foremost, all legal assertions point to the marriage contract being one in which you name "one person irreplaceable" (Perez v Sharp) and to hold a "place of unique and singular value" (Perez v Sharp) to you. A polygamous relationship, by its very definition, precludes this arrangement from ever taking place and, thus, has no relevance to the gay marriage debate.
Now that's all I am going to say about your red herring and I am going to let the rest of your snarky post slide for now because I can see that you are getting your ass handed to you on all fronts and, being the civilized chap that I am, see no reason to further add insult to your injury.