I know, you've told us that numerous times Navy. Just a search of the archieves for Polls, Bush, and Iraq shows us that.
As we can see Navy, when Bush was in office you were a huge advocate for ignoring polls and "the will of the people". Indeed, when a person wouldn't take action based on polls you stated things like this.
Saying how much you like it that people don't govern based on polls. And yet, it seems now that you're advocating polls DO matter and that a judge should judge based on polls.
That reminds me of something else you had said.
Just flip the liberal thing.
What I'm getting at Navy is simply appealing to polls is hollow. Its doubly hollow when its done by someone who previously continually discounted polls. Can polls be useful tools? Yep, they could back in 2005 with Iraq and they can today as well, you know, like the one some time ago that you discounted where people felt DADT should end. But polls in and of themselves should never be the only, or even primary, justification for something done by a government official because public opinion is continually swaying and at times simply unconstitutional or wrong.