- Joined
- Mar 11, 2006
- Messages
- 96,116
- Reaction score
- 33,462
- Location
- SE Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Let's see it.Absent his trial there is plenty of proof of this jerk's guilt.
Let's see it.Absent his trial there is plenty of proof of this jerk's guilt.
Just a word of warning: questioning mod decisions in threads is infraction worthy. I doubt what you said so far would get you infracted, but careful.
The linked story in the OP. Duh...
Is that your way of not answering the question through threat?
One accusation without any supporting evidence.
Duh. :roll:
That would explain why I did not call it a fact, but a supposition, yes.
Except most likely some are not.
Once again you don't even read what you write
Your statement:
That is a statement of fact made by you and when I asked you to prove your claim you pointed back to a single witness who doesn't even support his own claims.
Typical.
Really. And how do you know he's innocent?
Go ahead and produce the evidence we detained hundreds of innocent people
Carry on, Bill Nye.
Scientific evidence now points to global cooling, contrary to U.N. alarmism | Washington Examiner
Climate Cooling, the Other Side of Climate Change Science: Global Cooling
Evidence of Global Cooling…Study Censored by EPA | For Freedom's Sake
EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling - Washington Times
Evidence of Global Cooling - Special Report w/ Bret Baier - FOXNews.com
The pattern is that kool-aid drinking rightees don't believe any proof when it is provided by anyone except their kool-aid dispensing lying leaders. That's not what "justice is blind" means. :roll:
It's always entertaining how the right "eats their own" when one of their former heroes comes forward after witnessing illegalities. Wilkerson and Powell were well respected military men and Republicans serving on a very neo-con administration. Both of them have come forward chastising the Bush administration on a number of issues. To do so takes honor and courage. Qualities their former bosses never possessed.
This country has a credo, make that a law, stating "innocent until proven guilty". Yet, right wing zealots don't think that applies to anyone taken prisoner under the banner of Bush's "War on Terror". Rewards were offered and people were "given up" for the reward. No proof was required before those people were thrown in jail. How is this a Repub or Dem issue?
note: yes, I know I sometimes manage to go the "low road" myself. I am not perfect either, but I do try and be fair.
If they are prisoners of war, shouldn't the Geneva Convention apply?
Pull your head out........ he just corrected himself, and he is absolutely correct.So they are not prisoners of war. You want to have things both ways, but it don't work that way.
How do you declare war on a non-nation? Can some one declare war on the Republican party?
Pull your head out........ he just corrected himself, and he is absolutely correct.
Enemy combatants have no rights on the field of battle, or off.
You are just working for the ass hat of the year award this year......... right?
Your sources are from blogs and conservative sites, care to get any evidence from non-biased sources? I don't go around posting links to MSNBC or my grandma's blog since obviously they are biased.
And yet we have some evidence now that they are not enemy combatants either.
Now there's good debating. Can't argue facts, just call some one an ass.
Link..................
No... you are all over the place, just tossing **** to see if it will stick......... thought you might be going for the ass hat of the year award, it's very prestigious.
Washington examiner?
Fox news?
Climatecooling. org?
Washingtom times?
What do you want, a link from algores page? :roll:
Could someone please tell me where the ignore button is? Thanx in advance.