- Joined
- Mar 3, 2010
- Messages
- 60,458
- Reaction score
- 12,357
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Protecting the Constitution > Protecting the sensitivities of the abortion banners
And then we have that falsehood again..
Protecting the Constitution > Protecting the sensitivities of the abortion banners
No, you're wrong. They're people too and not just some label. I'm not going to play their game.
Wrong
A fetus is not a person
Qu'est que c'est? No. I wouldn't. Why? Do you even know who you're speaking to? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt though.
The onus is on you to prove this is systematic in the country or even somewhere close. What? Are you playing the "You have to prove I'm wrong" game? Nah buddy. Find me a statistic showing cases like these are regular. Then we'll go from there. However, we know they're no. What is known so far is that this is a rare issue.
Why? Well, the popularity of the case and the lack of cases before it. Now, Conservatives are turning into a situation similar to the 1980s mass pedophilia outbreaks. It's not really happening but they still want to prove it is. Chances are 1 year from now, nothing will have come from the dozens of new inspections and life will continue as normal.
Accurate? By who's accounts? Yours? Lolz. Please, stop it with the emotionality. It's depressing to watch.
Again, who's been asking the right questions? We don't know whether there is a nationally systemic problem. Maybe not, but maybe so. I don't think that you can claim that a "lack of cases" is proof of anything. It took 17 years for facts to emerge about Gosnell and his charnel house.
Again, who's been asking the right questions? We don't know whether there is a nationally systemic problem. Maybe not, but maybe so. I don't think that you can claim that a "lack of cases" is proof of anything. It took 17 years for facts to emerge about Gosnell and his charnel house.
WHERE ARE THE STATISTICS? Why has nobody kept track of incidents like this? If they're "systematic" - there should at least be one pro-life watch dog out there with the evidence to back it up. However, there aren't. There aren't dozens of butcher shops lightly disguised as abortion clinics and in the last 10 years not a SINGLE group has thought to keep track of the dozens that should - theoretically - exist. Why? It seems after such a horrible incident - there would be AT LEAST - one pro-life abortion clinic watch dog ready to come up with facts. There aren't.
WHERE ARE THE STATISTICS? Why has nobody kept track of incidents like this? If they're "systematic" - there should at least be one pro-life watch dog out there with the evidence to back it up. However, there aren't. There aren't dozens of butcher shops lightly disguised as abortion clinics and in the last 10 years not a SINGLE group has thought to keep track of the dozens that should - theoretically - exist. Why? It seems after such a horrible incident - there would be AT LEAST - one pro-life abortion clinic watch dog ready to come up with facts. There aren't.
I don't have an answer to your question. But I am sure you'll agree that it's stupifying that Gosnell's clinic wasn't inspected for 17 years. If it wasn't, why shouldn't we wonder about other clinics that have "flown under the radar"?
Again, who's been asking the right questions? We don't know whether there is a nationally systemic problem. Maybe not, but maybe so. I don't think that you can claim that a "lack of cases" is proof of anything. It took 17 years for facts to emerge about Gosnell and his charnel house.
The reason you don't have an answer to my question is that there simply isn't the epidemic of butcher shops you're wishing into existence.
WHERE ARE THE STATISTICS? Why has nobody kept track of incidents like this? If they're "systematic" - there should at least be one pro-life watch dog out there with the evidence to back it up. However, there aren't. There aren't dozens of butcher shops lightly disguised as abortion clinics and in the last 10 years not a SINGLE group has thought to keep track of the dozens that should - theoretically - exist. Why? It seems after such a horrible incident - there would be AT LEAST - one pro-life abortion clinic watch dog ready to come up with facts. There aren't.
No, you're wrong. They're people too and not just some label.
Protecting the Constitution > Protecting the sensitivities of the abortion banners
A fetus is not a person
Again, who's been asking the right questions? We don't know whether there is a nationally systemic problem. Maybe not, but maybe so. I don't think that you can claim that a "lack of cases" is proof of anything. It took 17 years for facts to emerge about Gosnell and his charnel house.
Are you for real?
Definition in first link:
And pretty much the same definition in the other two links. Birth control PREVENTS conception. If you get pregnant while on birth control, that means your birth control FAILED, and you are PREGNANT!
It is horrible what happened here. I believe if they are found guilty...nothing short of life in prison should be used. I'm more in favor of death if absolutely proved guilty.
However, I don't think this makes any case for abortions to be illegal. As a matter of fact, I think it does the opposite. Why? Well, if abortions become illegal they will go underground and more atrocious things like this will happen.
That doesnt excuse the state for completely droping the ball on keeping the facilities up to health code, sterile for medical procedures and adhering to a rather lenient state law code regarding abortion facilities.
Your line of thinking is why they kept excusing Gosnell's clinic in the first place. Dont enforce the law according to a socio-political agenda, just enforce it.
:shrug:
when I talk like what? When I describe the refusal to ascribe human terminology to an unborn child as dehumanization? Well, I mean, duh? It ain't praise-poetry.
It is horrible what happened here. I believe if they are found guilty...nothing short of life in prison should be used. I'm more in favor of death if absolutely proved guilty.
However, I don't think this makes any case for abortions to be illegal. As a matter of fact, I think it does the opposite. Why? Well, if abortions become illegal they will go underground and more atrocious things like this will happen.
The issue here, as the grand jury stated, is protection of the health of women and infants, not abortion.
And regardless of our individual views, I think we have the right to expect our states and cities to exercise due diligence.
It
is dehumanization, and it's linguistically purposeful. Much easier to kill the undesireables if they aren't perceived actually human, you know.