- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 80,422
- Reaction score
- 29,077
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
clownboy;10613088371.) said:It's a direct relevent answer to your supposition the company would be blamed by the majority if it were to take those actions.
And many still feel that way. This was not enacted through initiative (popular will), but federally through legislation. And it was enacted without majority public support. But you are wrong in that last point. Though folks may be against supporting unhealthy activities, they are more against subsidizing them. And this bill does not subsidize those activities (it doesn't require insurance companies to buy cigs for the smokers). However, it does require the subsidization of private sexual activity.
Now, that IS irrelevent to the discussion.
4.)Again, you have no way to show that, it is your opinion alone. In my opinion Obama and his supporters would be blamed for foisting this upon us in the first place. Also disagree with your characterization/frame of the issue. HL is in no way trying to force their religious beliefs upon employees. Employees are still free to participate and fund their own private sexual activities.
1.) no it had no relevance
2.) nothing wrong about my statement, its true
3.) no its not im showing you how your feeling inst a new one and many people have had feelings just like you way before you
4.) i agree 100% it is my opinion, never implied otherwise
dont care about obama and supporters lmao
they are in fact "trying" to force their religious views, they admitted that
what im asking you is about your calim that this company should shut down and fire everyone and that action would make people blame the law and not the company.
Im asking you why would i blame the company? im open to suggestion, pleae give me anything logic, or reality based to blame the law and not the company.