PogueMoran
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 2,834
- Reaction score
- 331
- Location
- Northeast
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Hows that legal challenge you claimed you were going to file coming along Crunch?
Hows that legal challenge you claimed you were going to file coming along Crunch?
But Janice Okubo says he approved the statement... so which is it? Who is lying?
Another of your lies...... gullible Faither.
Tell you what Glinda..... I'll file suit against Barry if you will pay for his defense out of your own pocket..... we can draw up papers to make it binding.
Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is? Or are you all Alinsky?
I'm not aware that she said that - you can post a link. But it sounds like she got approval for her to say it, not approval for the content of it. You do understand the difference don't you? You do know what an Attorney General's job is, don't you?
I posted the link, you just proudly didn't read it. :roll:
Yeah it musta been your evil twin who said this:
Glinda stated she would pay and you chickened out.
So wheres that suit?
I find it funny you call people faithers. You have no evidence that Obama isnt elligible yet you believe hes not. Thus far all evidence shows he is even the Supreme Court decided such when their chief justice swore him in. If anything its the birthers like yourself who would rightfully be called faithers.
There you go lying again....... you know damned good and well she chickened out.
Now you have to resort to empty accusations and assertions with zero evidence. No surprise.
No thanks, I already read all about the Republican National Committee's fundraising events.
Of course he doesnt. He misinterpreted what a letter said based and consistently misrepresents court cases. Just look how both him and the birther article jumped to the same wrong conclusion.I'm not aware that she said that - you can post a link. But it sounds like she got approval for her to say it, not approval for the content of it. You do understand the difference don't you? You do know what an Attorney General's job is, don't you?
Crunch said:Same as always....... as soon as anyone should be so crass as to actually question Barry's credentials, someone rushes in to get the thread tossed in the basement......... usually at around 100+ posts.
Good job Redress......... Barry is proud of you.
Of course he doesnt. He misinterpreted what a letter said based and consistently misrepresents court cases. Just look how both him and the birther article jumped to the same wrong conclusion.
Just look at how two gullible Faithers jumped to the same erroneous conclusion when reading the facts in a simple article….. See how that works? :lamo
Nobody has made erroneous conclusions except you.
No she repeatedly took you up on it and you backed out. You wouldnt file the challenge. So first you say you never said it when you did and it was proven Now you claim she chickened out..There you go lying again....... you know damned good and well she chickened out.
My "contract" has been published on the Internet for the entire world to see. Here it is again, since you seem to have missed it:
I promise to pay for President Obama's legal defense in this supposed "case" that Crunchyhas preparedis pretending toswears he willwants us to believe he's going to bring.
Now it's your turn to show us your "case."
All of this is absolutely, 100% correct. So why are you stalling? :doh
Yes says you. Despite having no evidence you claim obama isnt eligible. You and the birth failers act on faith.Says the gullible faither........
No she repeatedly took you up on it and you backed out. You wouldnt file the challenge. So first you say you never said it when you did and it was proven Now you claim she chickened out..
Anyone reading this can go to the thread and see you never followed through and chickened out.
Says the gullible faither........
There were no facts in that birther article. It came to the same bad conclusion you did based on a letter you both apparently didnt read.Just look at how two gullible Faithers jumped to the same erroneous conclusion when reading the facts in a simple article….. See how that works? :lamo
Yes says you. Despite having no evidence you claim obama isnt eligible. You and the birth failers act on faith.
Everyone who read that thread stated you chickened out. But let ask Glinda.Yes.... anyone except me for calling out your lies. Anyone that reads the 2 or 3 pages of her backing out will see her chicken out.
You are true to form.
Everyone who read that thread stated you chickened out. But let ask Glinda.
Incorrect you have your misinterpretation. 2 of your cases cant be found and when asked the details you couldnt answer because you copy and pasted from a birther blog. Wong Kim Ark was the only case that addressed foreign parents and stated that Wong Kim Ark became a citizen at the time of his birth. The very definition of a native born citizen. You then ignored the Mcreary caseNo.... I have 6 Supreme Court definitions of NBC that you have not, and can not refute because in over 100 years they have never varied.
True to form (liar), and a gullible Faither.
Yeah and anyone who does will see you chickened out. She promised to pay you failed to file the legal challenge. True to form you chicken out again.Why do you lie like this when anyone can go look and see the lie? Is it pathological?
You are now on ignore…….. The one and only I have.
Glad to know Navy thinks its legitimate and something to take your hat off to to have people question rather the United States killed 3,000+ of its own citizens on 9/11 to get into a war for oil. I mean, since he seems to think the only requirement for something to be legitimate is if:
Didn't realize you take your hat off to people who think 9/11 is an inside job Navy. Since birther's are just the whacked out mirror image of the whacked out truthers.
In all seriousness, simply because a large (though relatively small compared to the entire populations number) group believe something stupid does not mean it is any more credible nor legit. It strains all credibility to believe that throughout this entire political career no opponent no internal vetting would have turned this up in a way that was enough to cause a red flag, that there's some vast conspiracy going on in the state of Hawaii that dates back to the days of his birth, and on. Its idiotic, as idiotic as believing the US planned out 9/11 and took down the building with explosions to take the country to war.