- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Messages
- 52,009
- Reaction score
- 33,944
- Location
- The Golden State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
If that action (back in March to "support goals") addressed the VA issue to your satisfaction then I suppose they should be content that is all that needed to be done. Would a 6.5% increase in immigration law enforcement spending to "support goals" be a suitable compromise?
Again, the two issues are unrelated. Would a 6.5% increase in immigration law enforcement spending put an end to illegal immigration? I seriously doubt it. Would an increase in spending even be necessary? I doubt that, too. Does anyone in Washington want to put an end to illegal immigration? Not likely.