- Joined
- May 1, 2012
- Messages
- 27,375
- Reaction score
- 19,413
- Location
- Near Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
That's right. She gave permission for it to be published. Once it is published, it is part of the public domain. Her complaint now might be understandable, but has about the same legal basis as you claiming that I don't have the right to quote you in this reply, since I didn't ask you if I could.
Incorrect. She still retains copyright.
Is there a significant developmental difference between a 20 week old child and a 20 week old child. Simple question, with an obvious answer.
The question does not make sense.
As I recall they stated that they did no such thing, but said that they used it to show what a 20 week old child looked like.
They admitted they made it to look like a stillborn!
But given that we are living in a time period of cutting open the skulls of children whose hearts are beating and laughing about it all because, hey, what is funnier than dead babies in a box?, consider me a little jaundiced about your appeal to compassion.
:roll: