OldWorldOrder
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2012
- Messages
- 5,820
- Reaction score
- 1,438
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Cool. Tell us, in one paragraph what you think the problem is.
Disenfranchisement.
Cool. Tell us, in one paragraph what you think the problem is.
Do you believe that China has had free market capitalism? If so when did they begin to allow the people to make their own decisions?
Why do you think that? If we destroyed the mosques involved in supporting (intel, comms, C2, etc) and launching attacks against US people and property nearly every time, and if we killed the clerics involved every time how many attacks do you thin would occur from mosques?You sure in the hell won't get it by hitting Mecca and mosques!!!
Without bothering to go back to your original question didn't you ask why we (the west) were on top?Well, neither the West nor the East had free market capitalism in the late 1700s so....
That is laughable.Disenfranchisement.
Why do you think that? If we destroyed the mosques involved in supporting (intel, comms, C2, etc) and launching attacks against US people and property nearly every time, and if we killed the clerics involved every time how many attacks do you thin would occur from mosques?
Yes. And then we would go after those in turn. We must be deliberate, methodical, and consistent.I guess they would continue to attack from schools,markets and hospitals.
Without bothering to go back to your original question didn't you ask why we (the west) were on top?
We, the US have created more wealth for more people using the tenets of free market capitalism than any other devised system in history. We are failing now because we have strayed so far from it.
If you are asking a different question perhaps I will have a different answer.
When it swept here in Sydney yesterday, the police let them have it!
Thanks God for the Australian police! :thumbs: there is no way here in Australia they are going to put up with that s***
That is laughable.
Sorry, that's still very, very despicable. You're advocating killing hostages. That is disturbing. Very disturbing.
Yes. And then we would go after those in turn. We must be deliberate, methodical, and consistent.
Why do you think that? If we destroyed the mosques involved in supporting (intel, comms, C2, etc) and launching attacks against US people and property nearly every time, and if we killed the clerics involved every time how many attacks do you thin would occur from mosques?
They did what they were supposed to do and are an example to the world on how to handle these petulant animals......:applaud
You sure in the hell won't get it by hitting Mecca and mosques!!!
I said nothing about it being not disturbing. It should be. It is despicable, I would agree, very. Sometimes the best choice is the choice that is a caste Iron Bitch to make and live with. I've made few. I have to live with em. I can only hope I was right. But think of this, if a person take hostages realizes they cant use them as sheilds they much more likely to a) give up. b) not take them in the first place. It would not take many examples to ingrain this. It is the same reason we dont negotiate with terrorists. In the end less people get hurt. Sometimes the ends does jusitfy the means. The trick is to know when.
Are you saying that for every hostage situation in the United States you advocate killing the hostages?
Please answer this.
Second that!
Obama should learn a thing or two from Australia!:thumbs:
Of course it does. Nice try though.And what I told you pages ago is that the research doesn't back that up. That's the thing. Your opinion doesn't have a strong foundation in facts.
No. It is laughable. But really, really nice try though.No, it's the truth.
I know it's not as catchy as "GRAB THEIR ATTENTION!" but it's the fact.
Yes. Isn't that the whole point of killing people and breaking their things?So if the tables were turned and the Muslims were bombing every site of resistance in america would that discourage you from fighting?
I am interested in your thought process. How would destroying those places where the attacks were planned, supported and staged from make the problem worse?Probably a lot more since you attacked a mosque that would only make the problem worse.
Yes. Isn't that the whole point of killing people and breaking their things?
Do you think this is a game?
No. It is laughable. But really, really nice try though.