- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 29,262
- Reaction score
- 10,126
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
it's called, "due process".
Your post seems to suggest that assissinations would be acceptable.
lmao.......
it's called, "due process".
Your post seems to suggest that assissinations would be acceptable.
Snowden delivered secret documents into the hands of the Russians. That's treason, period.
Snowden delivered secret documents into the hands of the Russians. That's treason, period.
He released secret documents to the press not the ruskies.
He released secret documents to the press not the ruskies.
Really! Your proof of that?
The Russians gave him a safe haven. You think they didn't copy every document he had, in exchange?
Where's he living right now? In RUSSIA?
You really didn't pay close attention. Ed Snowden doesn't have the documents. You think he's running around with nearly two million documents (who knows how large each one is) on his person. That would certainly make him a target. Glenn Greenwald said that they made three copies and stashed them in three different locations around the world, ok? Furthermore, they contain little in the way of interest to the Russians because they are more focused on what the NSA does verses how. And then finally. Glenn Greenwald made clear way back at the beginning that the Gaurdian attorneys as well as attorneys from at least one outside source has looked over everything to be released to ensure that nothing that is released will be damaging to our countries national security. You STILL seem to fail to realise that Edward Snowden didn't set out to damage America. He set out to alert the American public to the fact that a government agency is violating our fourth amendment rights in a most egregious manner. That is what he has stated from the beginning. In contrast, you are unable to prove any of your claims about him.
Oh, we'll that's certainly PROOF that Russia has copied all the documents.
So, Snowden has zero acess to the information?
The Russians got something in return for giving him sanctuary. Lets employ a little common sense.
Sure, a stick in Obama's eye, nothing more. Now, have you any evidence that Edward Snowden gave anything to the Russian government that would put our safety at risk. If so please post it for me.
Put our dafety at risk? I don't know. Give acess to everything he had? You betcha.
Oh goodness. Exposing wrong doing has protection under the law. As a
business owner, I can tell you that it cannot be sanctioned.
Proof??
Employ some common sense??
It's patriotic, if it's done the right way. Stealing and publishing classified information is the wrong way to do it.
Snowden delivered secret documents into the hands of the Russians. That's treason, period.
The Russians got something in return for giving him sanctuary. Lets employ a little common sense.
Its not up to you or any one else to personally decide which laws are worthy of breaking and which ones need to be obeyed.
You people still don't get it.
These clowns shouldn't get a pass because they appeal to your personal political position.
We elect representives to decide whats legal and whats not, not provate citizens with an axe to grind.
They should be brought up on charges and face Jury of their peers and if they truly had conviction, they would have turned themself in years ago.
Its not up to you or any one else to personally decide which laws are worthy of breaking and which ones need to be obeyed.
You people still don't get it.
These clowns shouldn't get a pass because they appeal to your personal political position.
We elect representives to decide whats legal and whats not, not provate citizens with an axe to grind.
They should be brought up on charges and face Jury of their peers and if they truly had conviction, they would have turned themself in years ago.
Being a whistle-
blower does not require being a martyr.
So now youv'e redefined the term of what a whistleblower is ?
When does it stop ?
Its not up to you or any one else to personally decide which laws are worthy of breaking and which ones need to be obeyed.
You people still don't get it.
These clowns shouldn't get a pass because they appeal to your personal political position.
We elect representives to decide whats legal and whats not, not provate citizens with an axe to grind.
They should be brought up on charges and face Jury of their peers and if they truly had conviction, they would have turned themself in years ago.