- Joined
- Apr 13, 2011
- Messages
- 15,910
- Reaction score
- 12,630
- Location
- Plano, Texas
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Other
Yeah what he said
I'm the proud owner of a vagina, but thanks!
Yeah what he said
I'm the proud owner of a vagina, but thanks!
I'm the proud owner of a vagina, but thanks!
New or used:2razz:
Nope, plenty of gay men are not fairies. Some straight men are. Whomever leaked that had no right to=apparently it was someone employed by the caterer. they had no right to do that
I'm sure they were ''Well Rewarded,'' for their undercover Video, maybe they thought Romney would .......... Not Be As Flexible,
after the Election', in his reward to them',..... i'm jus sayin ??????
Well, we have a difference of opinion. I think the American people had a right to know how Mitt talked about them to his rich friends.
Mitt proved to be exceptionally flexible during the entire campaign. In fact, nobody had much of a clue as to where he stood on anything - except for his contempt for 47% of the population. He was pretty clear about that.
so if someone bugged Obama's conversations with Valerie Jarrett and some of his inner circle you'd feel the same way?
stuff said in confidence shouldn't be leaked by the help who violated the law
It was hardly a private meeting with his staff. It was a fat cat fundraiser.
stop fibbingg. Romney never denigrated hard work, success or America. his theme was constant on what really counted-getting America back to work
that does not contradict what I said-it wasn't one of the invitees who illegally taped the comments
Who's fibbing? He expressed disgust and contempt for 47% of the population - which apparently includes anybody getting money from the government for any reason. You know, like disabled veterans, old people, soldiers. No matter how you parse his words, that's what he's saying.
Mitt Romney's '47%' comments: a history - video | World news | guardian.co.uk
You know the folks who, it Mitt's words, don't take 'personal responsibility' for their actions because they're dependent on the government.
Of course not. The invitees agree with him 100%. It was probably one of the 'lesser types' serving the food and clearing the dishes out of the way, who recorded it.
I suspect whomever did that was a hysterical little fairy who was a loser pissed off at his lot in life and wanted to try to take someone down.
Odd to have such vitriol for the person who recorded it and not the one who said it. No matter what we think of him or anyone like him, if you speak and don't watch your words today, your a fool. Someone will catch it and share it.
I don't like rats who break confidence. the guy broke the law. he had no right to do that. He's scum.
Trouble with that thinking is it allows rats to hide. But that is irrelevant, in today's world you can't do this and not be found out.
the guy who did that broke the law. we all know that most politicians (including Obama) say stuff to supporters they don't want out in the public. same with attorneys. I often tell people I am representing what I think of the other attorney, the judge, witnesses etc. if my secretary were to convey that publicly she would be fired and would never work in that business again.
a contract caterer's employee was way out of line doing that
you like it because it hurt Romney. but it was dishonest and the person who did it should be taken apart for doing that
Irrelevant to this discussion. No matter the law, no matter what you or like, anyone who says stupid **** in public is a fool.
but the thread is about the leaker not Romney
fail on your part. the leaker is a scumbag =ought to be someone's prison bitch
You can't talk about one absent the other. We live in a world where nothing is private. We don't have to worry about big brother. We have to worry about everyone. So he person, well, he's just one of us. You might do it against a democrat. Who knows. Bt some partisan would. He'll someone who h no party affiliation might. Something that stupid would get someone's interest. it's too god to pass on.