• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Evidence The Titanic Was Sunk on Purpose

View attachment 67187865

These above images are used by conspiracy theorists alleging a difference in the windows on B-deck -which should not be surprising as two private verandahs and suites were added to this section of the ship after it's launch.
This claim is often mentioned alongside the above claim about the apparent discrepancy in the number of portholes on Titanic's port side bow. And the answer is the same. Titanic was a work in progress, designed to be a better, improved version of her older sister Olympic. The difference in windows on B-deck between the time of her launch and her maiden voyage is explained by one of the key differences between the two ships: instead of a promenade as on Olympic's B deck, two private verandahs and suites were added to Titanic, hence necessitating a change in the B deck window configurations.

The Olympic Switch Theory: Did the Titanic Really Sink? | William Murdoch
I have read his theories actually I don't think it was for the money.. If you looked at the picture, I provided their are some differences in the ships structures to prove some aspects of the idea it was stitched. People just can't expect that a business would go that far for money.
 
The site I linked to is interesting. It deals with all of the CT Titanic myths. Very comprehensive.
 
I have read his theories actually I don't think it was for the money.. If you looked at the picture, I provided their are some differences in the ships structures to prove some aspects of the idea it was stitched. People just can't expect that a business would go that far for money.

No you took some info from a CT site (Ct sites are notoriously dishonest) and assumed that it was "evidence", never bothering to see if it was true or not.
 
I have read his theories actually I don't think it was for the money.. If you looked at the picture, I provided their are some differences in the ships structures to prove some aspects of the idea it was stitched. People just can't expect that a business would go that far for money.

What does "aspects of the idea it was stitched" mean? It is not a theory. The veranda was added later but I suppose that is far too mundane for the conspiracy theorists. No business deliberately drowns hundreds of people. Get real.
 
Last edited:
See post number 18. Do you really think that the alleged conspirators would be stupid enough to send out a ship with different portholes? Be serious please.

Cters always believe that the evil perpetrators, be they Jews, Govt, Space Vamps etc. will get all the hard stuff right but mess up on the easy details.
 
And you actually beleive a news station in the U.S to tell the truth?

You actually believe a youtube vid to be the truth?

Check and verify any source. Have you done that?

By providing sources it is shown that the OP youtube is questionable in being accurate. I just happened to post two of many sources that basically counters the OP youtube.

Why don't you show us with sources what is wrong with the article.

Your turn.:mrgreen:
 
Last edited:
And you can see the diffenrces in some aspects of the ships look at the first desk and second desk.

Yeah I can see that the site you took the pics from lied. (Why am I not surprised?)
Sorry game over!
 
So two sister ships looking similar is your evidence?
Seriously?
I mean seriously?
In all seriously is that your evidence?


Did you not see the differences in the picture or you just hate that your wrong?
 
Yeah I can see that the site you took the pics from lied. (Why am I not surprised?)
Sorry game over!

Yeah right......" Your just pissed off you not able to see the differences. Lmao
 
Did you not see the differences in the picture or you just hate that your wrong?
Your pic of the Titanic was of the Olympic.
Sorry fail upon fail.
Here this might help you realize the error.
perhaps then you might learn that ALL conspiracy sites lie. Once you learn that you will understand that you must never ever ever take their "evidence" at face value.
https://www.google.ca/search?q=tita...hj2SCh2x_gbl#safe=off&tbm=isch&q=olympic+ship
https://www.google.ca/search?q=tita...hj2SCh2x_gbl#safe=off&tbm=isch&q=titanic+ship
 
Yeah right......" Your just pissed off you not able to see the differences. Lmao

I saw the differences. Your "titanic" pic is of the Olympic.
See my preceding post.
Of course I don't expect a Cter to ever ever ever admit being in error. That would mean they are able to learn and if they can learn they will stop being Cters.
 

Those pics come from this site
Racing Through the Night - The Story of Olympic, Titanic

Which says
"On the night of April 14-15, Olympic was only one day out of New York harbor when she received a distress signal from Titanic, which had struck an iceberg and was sinking. Olympic's captain, Herbert J. Haddock, ordered his ship to speed toward the sinking sister ship. As Olympic raced into the night, her passengers and crew prepared for a rescue operation that, tragically,they would never be close enough to enact. This is the story of that awful night and the Olympic's role in it - and the aftermath of the Titanic disaster."

All sorted out now?
 
The thread was doomed to failure because there is no evidence that shows that the Titanic was sunk on purpose.
 
The thread was doomed to failure because there is no evidence that shows that the Titanic was sunk on purpose.

You are ignoring how the Jews manoeuvered the iceberg into position!
 
This proposed "theory' has major flaws. How did Captain Smith know where the iceberg was and why did he commit suicide? Was the first officer in on it? If he was the why didn't he sail the ship straight into the iceberg? If he was in on it and he knew that the only way to sink the ship was to rip a hole along the side of the ship in just the right place then how did he do that? None of the passengers or seamen noticed that they were on the Olympic and not the Titanic? This just goes to show how daft the deliberately sunk theory is. The internet has a lot to answer for. Instead of young people going out and chasing the opposite sex now we have this sort of thing.
 
Last edited:
"Like all good conspiracy theories, this one is incredibly complex, based on several supposedly questionable events and apparent coincidences that occurred (or supposedly did so) between the Titanic’s launch on May 31, 1911, and the ten-second encounter with the iceberg at 11:40 PM on April 14, 1912. The starting premise of Gardiner’s thesis is that the two ships, the Olympic and Titanic, were designed to be as identical sisters, as alike as two peas in a pod. By the time the Titanic was launched, this was no longer true, of course, as several modifications had been made to the details of her design before she was even put into the water, details which subtly but unmistakably differentiated the two ships. Not to be put off by this inconvenient fact, Gardiner blithely sails on to describe how the Olympic, which had gone into White Star Line service in June 1911, turned out to be a rather unlucky ship with a spotty service record, and eventually became such a liability that her owners decided to dispose of her. In the most sneaky manner possible, of course."
the two liners was done to perpetrate an insurance fraud on a near-unimaginable scale. The “Titanic”–actually the crippled and irreparable Olympic–would be lost at sea, and an insurance claim for her total value, some $15,000,000 in 1912, would be filed and of necessity honored.

"How this was to be brought about is the most entertaining–and mindlessly absurd–aspect of the entire theory. It was intended for the “Titanic” to steam into an area where several ships would be waiting nearby, the better to take off the passengers and crew of the stricken liner, where a collision would be staged, the “Titanic’s” sea cocks opened, and the ship scuttled, the “victim” of the “damage” suffered in the collision. Some, though not all, of the ship’s senior officers, including Captain Smith and First Officer Murdoch, were in on the scheme and were tasked with carrying out the “accident” and overseeing a successful evacuation of the ship. Any loss of lives, no matter how few, was never part of the plan."

"Despite all of the readily apparent holes in Gardiner’s theory, it has gained a surprising amount of traction among the credulous and easily-led, as well as that fringe element that always seems to prefer embracing a conspiracy theory, no matter how far-fetched, to the truth. Sadly for them, any credence that might have resided in Gardiner’s “insurance-fraud switch theory” was eliminated by a simple three-digit number: 401. You see, the hull number assigned to the Olympic by her builder, Harland and Wolff, was 400; the number assigned to the Titanic was 401. This number was cut, stamped, engraved, burned, or painted onto every major component and piece of machinery for each ship, in order to make sure that the correct parts went to the right vessel. A component for Hull No. 400 would never be used in Hull No. 401, and vice-versa. And as nearly-identical as the two ships were, as shown earlier, the Olympic and the Titanic were not exact twins."
The Titanic and Olympic were “switched” in an insurance-fraud scheme | RMS Titanic Remembered
 
And as luck would have it, in 1986 one of the first expeditions to the wreck of the ship that sank on April 15, 1912, happened to take a photograph of the starboard propellor. One of the blades is sitting bolt upright, and unmistakably visible on it, almost as clear as the day it was stamped there, is the number “401.” The Titanic–the real Titanic.

This is one myth that can definitely be described not as “busted” but as “sunk.”
 
Back
Top Bottom