- Joined
- Oct 27, 2011
- Messages
- 101,998
- Reaction score
- 45,491
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Of course they do. That's why nearly half this nation believes in creationism, for example.
Thank you. Then we are in agreement. :thumbs:
Of course they do. That's why nearly half this nation believes in creationism, for example.
That is a lie. She has given over 200 interviews in the last year. That's more than one every other day.
Speaking of which, despite the hideous treatment of her last night, she decides to hold another press conference the very next morning. This woman ain't afraid.
She or her staff picked who she would talk to. Invitations from O'Reilly and others were ignored. Also, her campaigns counts appearances on talk shows where her fat ass is covered in kisses.
Prove these claims with reputable citations.
Nothing can prove anything to Hillaryphiles.
appears i am in a distinct minority. my impression was that lauer did a decent job. he was even-handed
hillary started out conforming to the agreement entered into immediately prior to the interview; that the candidates would respond with their own agendas and proposals rather than attacking their opponent. but she could not hold to the agtreement, and lauer rightfully gave tRump the same latitude
the questions to hillary regarding her email snafu helped her in my estimation. she was able to forcefully communicate that she never violated security protocol by sending a security-tagged email
similarly, lauer persisted with tRump after tRump insisted he would always answer questions truthfully, by quoting the candidate's statement about knowing more about how to deal with isis than the generals. that, in turn, led tRump to disparage the nation's general corps and intimate that he would intrude on the military's flag rank promotion practices by selecting his own general staff
my biggest complaint about lauer's moderation was that his questions were not as narrowly focued on the military and veteran issues as i believe they should have been. for instance, hillary's email issue has almost nothing to do with those topics
the NBC talent responsible to identifying members of the attendees should receive a promotion for her good work. the questions she found from the assembled veterans were the best portions of the discussions
I watched the forum last night. Lauer put Hillary through the gauntlet and Trump through the royal treatment. He kept cutting Hillary off while letting Trump ramble on. He refused to fact-check Trump's blatant lie about not supporting the Iraq War, among other things. And OMG, that yes/no question at the end--"Are you prepared to be President on Day One?" was one of the softest questions in the history of journalism. Lauer was an absolute joke, not just for himself but for the entire NBC and MSNBC networks.
Trump repeats wrong claim that he opposed Iraq War | PolitiFactBlatant lie about the Iraq war? You mean the blatant lie from the frauds in the media that Trump told Howard Stern he supported the war?
Total BS, as usual. An 8 second sound bite, and the hesitant "I guess so" answer to Sterns question does not make for support for the Iraq war.
Another pathetic attempt to lie, distort, and misrepresent facts by Hillary Clinton, her MSM partners, and the pack who respond to the dog whistles.
I watched the forum last night. Lauer put Hillary through the gauntlet and Trump through the royal treatment. He kept cutting Hillary off while letting Trump ramble on. He refused to fact-check Trump's blatant lie about not supporting the Iraq War, among other things. And OMG, that yes/no question at the end--"Are you prepared to be President on Day One?" was one of the softest questions in the history of journalism. Lauer was an absolute joke, not just for himself but for the entire NBC and MSNBC networks.
Blatant lie about the Iraq war? You mean the blatant lie from the frauds in the media that Trump told Howard Stern he supported the war?
Total BS, as usual. An 8 second sound bite, and the hesitant "I guess so" answer to Sterns question does not make for support for the Iraq war.
Another pathetic attempt to lie, distort, and misrepresent facts by Hillary Clinton, her MSM partners, and the pack who respond to the dog whistles.
Blatant lie about the Iraq war? You mean the blatant lie from the frauds in the media that Trump told Howard Stern he supported the war?
Total BS, as usual. An 8 second sound bite, and the hesitant "I guess so" answer to Sterns question does not make for support for the Iraq war.
Another pathetic attempt to lie, distort, and misrepresent facts by Hillary Clinton, her MSM partners, and the pack who respond to the dog whistles.
Another unproven claim.
I believe Matt Lauer was right to go after Hillary on the emails because, frankly, that whole things is tied in with national security, which itself is tied to being a Commander in Chief.
Where Matt Lauer was in the wrong was actually on 2 levels at the same time.
1) He continually cut Clinton off as she was trying to answer, saying that time was short. I never did get a chance to know Clinton's response to a couple of those questions because she was not allowed to give her answers before being cut off.
2) On the other hand, Lauer never asked Trump any hard questions, and gave him time to answer fully what he was asked, instead of cutting him off.
It is clear that Lauer was biased in his treatment of both candidates. As a result, I really don't know if either candidate would be OK as a commander in chief because of the way Lauer ****ed it all up. This would have been a good time for me to see if Trump is better than I believe he is, but I didn't get a chance to find out because Trump was never asked the pertinent questions. As for Hillary, I don't know either because she was never allowed to finish any of her answers.
Here is what I would like to see during the first debate - Each candidate gets grilled by a questioner that is picked by the other candidate. For Trump, it could be Michael Moore asking the questions, and for Hillary, it could be Rush Limbaugh asking the questions. THIS would be way more interesting than what I saw last night. LOL.
Didn't realize that Lauer was going to vote for Trump.
Looks like the liberal standard the Huffers are very disappointed in Matt. I guess he did not kiss Hillarys ass enough. I wonder how he will respond to his critics?
Matt Lauer Failed The Moderator Test | Huffington Post
That is a lie. She has given over 200 interviews in the last year. That's more than one every other day.
Speaking of which, despite the hideous treatment of her last night, she decides to hold another press conference the very next morning. This woman ain't afraid.
I think he did great. Both sides are pissed. He did his job.
One executive, speaking anonymously, was blunt about it: "Disaster."
The day after Lauer's back-to-back interviews of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, several high ranking sources at the network said they hear the criticism and agree with at least some of it....
It's unanimous. NBC is in crisis mode.
Behind the scenes, NBC execs concede Matt Lauer forum performance was "disaster" - Sep. 8, 2016
Hillary had trouble counting to 4 lives lost in Libya.
I agree.
I think the commentary aftermath was intended to be more of a shot across the debates moderator's bow.
Behave or else.
I just realized you're not the same person as justabubba. :3oops:
I don't know how I'm going to keep track of you two. :shock: