As detainees, they are being held for prosecution. But they won't be prosecuted because the evidence is so weak or can't be introduced because of being obtained by torture, they would be found guilty and set free. This was known from, practically, the beginning:
Enough to make you gag | The Economist
Quote Originally Posted by poweRob View Post:
"Interpreting the constitution is the sole job of the SCOTUS. That is what they are there for."
Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post:
"Ok...where does Article 3 of The Constitution say interpret?"
It’s called “judicial review”. The following is an excerpt from the full text in the reference below:
“While the function of judicial review is not explicitly provided in the Constitution, it had been anticipated before the adoption of that document. Prior to 1789, state courts had already overturned legislative acts which conflicted with state constitutions. Moreover, many of the Founding Fathers expected the Supreme Court to assume this role in regard to the Constitution; Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, for example, had underlined the importance of judicial review in the Federalist Papers, which urged adoption of the Constitution.”
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/constitutional.aspx