• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

More idiotic nonsense solicited from reporters at NBC to fuel the fire.

Excon

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 21, 2012
Messages
40,615
Reaction score
9,087
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Independent
More idiotic nonsense solicited from reporters at NBC to fuel the fire.


Local police chief has 'concerns' about Zimmerman
By James Novogrod, NBC News

The police chief in the Florida city where George Zimmerman lives expressed concerns Thursday that Zimmerman remains able to carry a gun, even after repeated run-ins with police following his acquittal this summer in the Trayvon Martin killing.

“I’m a small-town police chief. If I had the authority to revoke his firearm license, I would certainly sit down and consider that,” Steve Bracknell, the chief of police in Lake Mary, said during a telephone interview with NBC News.

“Does anyone else except me see a pattern?” Bracknell continued. “The word firearm keeps popping up.”


Local police chief has 'concerns' about Zimmerman - U.S. News

There is no real concern here.
A moving violation while legally carrying is not a part of a legitimate pattern of concern.
A false allegation/assumption is not a part of a legitimate pattern of concern.



And they are still reporting that no gun was found on Zimmerman.
Police said no gun was found on George Zimmerman -- and his wife and other witnesses later said they had not actually seen a firearm.
Local police chief has 'concerns' about Zimmerman - U.S. News
 
More idiotic nonsense solicited from reporters at NBC to fuel the fire.


Local police chief has 'concerns' about Zimmerman
By James Novogrod, NBC News

The police chief in the Florida city where George Zimmerman lives expressed concerns Thursday that Zimmerman remains able to carry a gun, even after repeated run-ins with police following his acquittal this summer in the Trayvon Martin killing.

“I’m a small-town police chief. If I had the authority to revoke his firearm license, I would certainly sit down and consider that,” Steve Bracknell, the chief of police in Lake Mary, said during a telephone interview with NBC News.

“Does anyone else except me see a pattern?” Bracknell continued. “The word firearm keeps popping up.”


Local police chief has 'concerns' about Zimmerman - U.S. News

There is no real concern here.
A moving violation while legally carrying is not a part of a legitimate pattern of concern.
A false allegation/assumption is not a part of a legitimate pattern of concern.



And they are still reporting that no gun was found on Zimmerman.
Police said no gun was found on George Zimmerman -- and his wife and other witnesses later said they had not actually seen a firearm.
Local police chief has 'concerns' about Zimmerman - U.S. News

If I were Zimmerman, after that interview became public, I would call my attorney and see if I had civil lawsuit material. That police chief, in my opinion, was totally out of line. He should be reprimanded.
 
If I were Zimmerman, after that interview became public, I would call my attorney and see if I had civil lawsuit material. That police chief, in my opinion, was totally out of line. He should be reprimanded.
Interesting.
I do not see it as actionable. He is allowed to have concerns even if they are idiotic. He is also aloud to speak of them.
He even went as far as to couch them with "if".
He didn't say he would revoke it, only that he would consider it.
“I’m a small-town police chief. If I had the authority to revoke his firearm license, I would certainly sit down and consider that,”
Idiotic? Yes.

Actionable? No.


Fueling the fire? Absolutely.
 
Interesting.
I do not see it as actionable. He is allowed to have concerns even if they are idiotic. He is also aloud to speak of them.
He even went as far as to couch them with "if".
He didn't say he would revoke it, only that he would consider it.
“I’m a small-town police chief. If I had the authority to revoke his firearm license, I would certainly sit down and consider that,”
Idiotic? Yes.

Actionable? No.


Fueling the fire? Absolutely.

"Does anyone besides me see a pattern? The word firearm keeps popping up."

He should be ashamed of himself.

Think he'd say of a copper who'd been put on Admin Leave for a bullying complaint during an interview with the press: "Does anyone but me see a pattern? The word bullying keeps popping up." He'd be hung from a yardarm in the town square.
 
He should be ashamed of himself.
Just saying I don't see anything actionable (sufficient reason to take legal action) in his response.
If the city counsel, Mayor, or whomever is in charge of him wishes to to admonish him for fueling the ire, that is their prerogative, nor would I complain if it was only an admonishment.
 
Back
Top Bottom