• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Report: George Zimmerman's wife says he threatened her[W:152]

George Zimmerman just lost his PR position. Basically everyone will now drop him like a hot potato.

Shooting someone in self defense and then him used as a political tool is one thing. Going over to his wife who has filed for divorce and her father and acting like an asshole is another. Curiously, no charges are filed against him, but this is the incident that will destroy his reputation to everyone.

You are jumping to conclusions without knowing, the full story

Disagreements happen on all marriages.....to say that *his reputation* will be destroyed by this... is simply ridiculous
 
You are jumping to conclusions without knowing, the full story

Disagreements happen on all marriages.....to say that *his reputation* will be destroyed by this... is simply ridiculous

Most disagreements do not end in 9/11 calls.

What remains to be seen is if this is more of a reflection of him or her - or a combination of both.
 
That's a lot of wind just to deny you were hiding behind someone else's post. :roll:
Why are you lying again?
I hid behind nobodies post.
Hell, by making the accusation, you have even shown you do not know what it means.





did you see his new posted lie?
he said he edited his post before my reply, ive never seen such dishonesty posted in an attempt to save face
That is a lie huh?
Prove it then.
Prove it wasn't edited before you posted. You can't because it was posted before you made your reply.
You may have hit the quote button before it was edited, but you did not post (hit the submit button) before my edit was posted.
So this is just one of your many lies.


why do you continue to lie?
That would be you.

this was your statment
"Obviously the part where you are wrong."
And?
Even though this is what we have been arguing because you were wrong by virtue of what you posted, it was also changed before you posted.


you were 100% wrong and posting lies about doesnt change anythign thatw why your post got destroryed by me and others
Wrong as usual.
And the lies are yours.


it is also a lie to say you edited before i posted, if that was true then your original words would not be in my quote.
Wrong!
I was already in the process of editing when you quoted. My edit was posted before your reply was. Which is why it isn't reflected.
But you have been here long enough to know all this.
So you aren't just mistaken, but are engaged in purposeful lying.


you lose to facts again, nice try bit its another fail for you LMAO you are so busted
:naughty
No.
Get the facts straight.
You are the one who has lost to the facts, lied, deflected and dodged, and are busted for it.


if you disagree by all means use FACTS and prove otherwise now, we'd love to read them
man up , stop dodging the question and post what "I" was wrong about in your next post
I have already posted what you were wrong about.
You were wrong by virtue of what you provided. You know that is what my argument has been since I first stated it.
You were wrong because what you provided was wrong.
How many time do you need to be told that?

And again!
Bottom line is, what you provided was wrong because Shelli lied. She never saw a firearm.

You do not get to hide behind the article by saying it is what they said when you are the one who provided it.


how much does anybody want to bet his next post is another dodge?
You are the only one who has been dodging.
Dodging their being wrong by virtue of what they provided.
I am not wrong for pointing that out. Nor is it a dodge, but what has become the main point.
So stop lying.

And pay attention:
Maybe next time when you are asked "really", you will understand that means that there is other information out there that you should make yourself aware of, instead of deflecting with all your absurdities.



:laughat:
AGENT J said:
I'm kind of a big deal
 
Why are you lying again?
I hid behind nobodies post.
Hell, by making the accusation, you have even shown you do not know what it means.





That is a lie huh?
Prove it then.
Prove it wasn't edited before you posted. You can't because it was posted before you made your reply.
You may have hit the quote button before it was edited, but you did not post (hit the submit button) before my edit was posted.
So this is just one of your many lies.


That would be you.

And?
Even though this is what we have been arguing because you were wrong by virtue of what you posted, it was also changed before you posted.


Wrong as usual.
And the lies are yours.


Wrong!
I was already in the process of editing when you quoted. My edit was posted before your reply was. Which is why it isn't reflected.
But you have been here long enough to know all this.
So you aren't just mistaken, but are engaged in purposeful lying.


:naughty
No.
Get the facts straight.
You are the one who has lost to the facts, lied, deflected and dodged, and are busted for it.


I have already posted what you were wrong about.
You were wrong by virtue of what you provided. You know that is what my argument has been since I first stated it.
You were wrong because what you provided was wrong.
How many time do you need to be told that?

And again!
Bottom line is, what you provided was wrong because Shelli lied. She never saw a firearm.

You do not get to hide behind the article by saying it is what they said when you are the one who provided it.


You are the only one who has been dodging.
Dodging their being wrong by virtue of what they provided.
I am not wrong for pointing that out. Nor is it a dodge, but what has become the main point.
So stop lying.

And pay attention:
Maybe next time when you are asked "really", you will understand that means that there is other information out there that you should make yourself aware of, instead of deflecting with all your absurdities.



:laughat:
BOOM! i sooo called it, i said your next post would be another dodge
translation: you have no facts to back up the lie you posted, ill keep waiting, post a link showing where i was factually wrong
we have been laughing and waiting
 
BOOM! i sooo called it, i said your next post would be another dodge
translation: you have no facts to back up the lie you posted, ill keep waiting, post a link showing where i was factually wrong
we have been laughing and waiting
More lies I see.
Well you are wrong.
Apparently I called it.
Just more lies, deflection, and dodging from you.

:laughat:
 
More lies I see.
Well you are wrong.
Apparently I called it.
Just more lies, deflection, and dodging from you.

translation: you have no facts to back up the lie you posted, ill keep waiting, post a link showing where i was factually wrong
we have been laughing and waiting
 
Last edited:
:laughat:
translation: you have no facts to back up the lie you posted, ill keep waiting, post a link showing where i was factually wrong
we have been laughing and waiting
:doh
Apparently you can't translate either.


And again!
Bottom line is, what you provided was wrong because Shelli lied. She never saw a firearm.

What we have here folks is J attempting to change the argument.
He knows what the argument is.
He is wrong by virtue of what he provided.
He is trying to hide behind the fact that he didn't actually make the false claim.
The problem with that is that he provided it.
That is what is and was claimed.
He is wrong by virtue of what he provided.

Sorry J, you don't get to change the argument.
You are wrong by virtue of what you provided.
As previously and continuously stated.

And pay attention:
Maybe next time when you are asked "really", you will understand that means that there is other information out there that you should make yourself aware of, instead of deflecting with all your absurdities
 
:laughat:
:doh
Apparently you can't translate either.


And again!
Bottom line is, what you provided was wrong because Shelli lied. She never saw a firearm.

What we have here folks is J attempting to change the argument.
He knows what the argument is.
He is wrong by virtue of what he provided.
He is trying to hide behind the fact that he didn't actually make the false claim.
The problem with that is that he provided it.
That is what is and was claimed.
He is wrong by virtue of what he provided.

Sorry J, you don't get to change the argument.
You are wrong by virtue of what you provided.
As previously and continuously stated.

And pay attention:
Maybe next time when you are asked "really", you will understand that means that there is other information out there that you should make yourself aware of, instead of deflecting with all your absurdities

translation: you have no facts to back up the lie you posted, we will keep waiting, post a link showing where i was factually wrong
we have been laughing and waiting, its hilarious you cant
facts destroy you again
 
Why are you lying again?
I hid behind nobodies post.
Hell, by making the accusation, you have even shown you do not know what it means.





That is a lie huh?
Prove it then.
Prove it wasn't edited before you posted. You can't because it was posted before you made your reply.
You may have hit the quote button before it was edited, but you did not post (hit the submit button) before my edit was posted.
So this is just one of your many lies.


That would be you.

And?
Even though this is what we have been arguing because you were wrong by virtue of what you posted, it was also changed before you posted.


Wrong as usual.
And the lies are yours.


Wrong!
I was already in the process of editing when you quoted. My edit was posted before your reply was. Which is why it isn't reflected.
But you have been here long enough to know all this.
So you aren't just mistaken, but are engaged in purposeful lying.


:naughty
No.
Get the facts straight.
You are the one who has lost to the facts, lied, deflected and dodged, and are busted for it.


I have already posted what you were wrong about.
You were wrong by virtue of what you provided. You know that is what my argument has been since I first stated it.
You were wrong because what you provided was wrong.
How many time do you need to be told that?

And again!
Bottom line is, what you provided was wrong because Shelli lied. She never saw a firearm.

You do not get to hide behind the article by saying it is what they said when you are the one who provided it.


You are the only one who has been dodging.
Dodging their being wrong by virtue of what they provided.
I am not wrong for pointing that out. Nor is it a dodge, but what has become the main point.
So stop lying.

And pay attention:
Maybe next time when you are asked "really", you will understand that means that there is other information out there that you should make yourself aware of, instead of deflecting with all your absurdities.



:laughat:

Your continued denial does not change the fact that you were hiding behind another's post. You even said yourself that you were not hiding because you suggested you did not know if the claim was true or not -- so I posted links to several of your posts where you did not offer such an inquiry. So even by your idiotic excuse that you weren't hiding because you pondered, "if..." you were hiding behind his posts before you said, "if..." And that's by your standard, as pathetically lame as it is. :roll:
 
Your continued denial does not change the fact that you were hiding behind another's post. You even said yourself that you were not hiding because you suggested you did not know if the claim was true or not -- so I posted links to several of your posts where you did not offer such an inquiry. So even by your idiotic excuse that you weren't hiding because you pondered, "if..." you were hiding behind his posts before you said, "if..." And that's by your standard, as pathetically lame as it is. :roll:
:doh :doh :doh
You really have a hard time paying attention to that which has come before.

This claim/argument of yours was already shown to be wrong/a lie, because I did make inquiry in those posts.
The last just being a continuation of this discussion where it was already established as an "If".
You have nothing other than false assertions.
 
Last edited:
:laughat:
translation: you have no facts to back up the lie you posted, we will keep waiting, post a link showing where i was factually wrong
we have been laughing and waiting, its hilarious you cant
facts destroy you again
We are still laughing at your silly dodges and deflections.

Yep folks. He is still dodging and deflecting because he can't admit to being wrong.

He knows what the argument is.
He is wrong by virtue of what he provided.
He is trying to hide behind the fact that he didn't actually make the false claim.
The problem with that is that he provided it.
That is what is and was claimed.
He is wrong by virtue of what he provided.


post a link showing where i was factually wrong
[...], its hilarious you cant
Funny!
Although that is and was not my argument, but that to which you are trying to change it (Which ain't gonna happen.), I have already shown where you were factually wrong about saying I was lying and showed how you were wrong about my editing of my own post.


Keep plugging J, maybe some day you will be right.
 
:laughat:

We are still laughing at your silly dodges and deflections.

Yep folks. He is still dodging and deflecting because he can't admit to being wrong.

He knows what the argument is.
He is wrong by virtue of what he provided.
He is trying to hide behind the fact that he didn't actually make the false claim.
The problem with that is that he provided it.
That is what is and was claimed.
He is wrong by virtue of what he provided.


Funny!
Although that is and was not my argument, but that to which you are trying to change it (Which ain't gonna happen.), I have already shown where you were factually wrong about saying I was lying and showed how you were wrong about my editing of my own post.


Keep plugging J, maybe some day you will be right.

translation: you still have no facts to back up the lie you posted, we will keep waiting. Post a link showing where i was factually wrong
we have been laughing and waiting, its hilarious you cant
facts destroy you again
 
yep, he died posts ago its obvious to everyone but him
BTW i love that movie, got it on DVD

It is a classic for all time. We finally shared it with our children. My six year old now wants to see it repeatedly, and will announce at dinner "Mawwiage ... is what brings us togever, today. And wuv! TWUE wuv ... " etc. It's hysterical. :D

"Have you, the wing?"
 
:doh :doh :doh
You really have a hard time paying attention to that which has come before.

This claim/argument of yours was already shown to be wrong/a lie, because I did make inquiry in those posts.
The last just being a continuation of this discussion where it was already established as an "If".
You have nothing other than false assertions.
Now you're lying to cover up for your hiding behind another's post. Your use of "if" came after you made multiple posts without specifying "if." So even if one accepts your inane excuse that using "if" absolves you of hiding behind another's post in lieu of citing actual sources, as ridiculous as that is ... you still hid behind his post without questioning its veracity before you finally did.
 
:laughat:

We are still laughing at your silly dodges and deflections.
I still get a good laugh at how you continue squawk back to others what they first say to you, like a parrot.

nope thats why we are laughing at your failed post and the lie you posted.

That is why I am laughing at your postings and your attempt to be dishonest.



we have been laughing and waiting, its hilarious you cant facts destroy you again

We are still laughing at your silly dodges and deflections.

:lamo :lamo :lamo
 
translation: you still have no facts to back up the lie you posted, we will keep waiting. Post a link showing where i was factually wrong
we have been laughing and waiting, its hilarious you cant
facts destroy you again
Translation: Dodge and deflection by Agent J.

You are still lying.
The facts have already been provided.
 
I still get a good laugh at how you continue squawk back to others what they first say to you, like a parrot.
And?
What they say applies to them.
So it is applicable.
 
And?
What they say applies to them.
So it is applicable.

Except that it doesn't. All you do is expose how much a comment stings you that the best you can do is parrot it back. :eek:
 
I still get a good laugh at how you continue squawk back to others what they first say to you, like a parrot.






:lamo :lamo :lamo

yeah i laughed out loud about that too, it was funny watching that thinking anybody would fall for his act
 
Translation: Dodge and deflection by Agent J.

You are still lying.
The facts have already been provided.

translation: you still have no facts to back up the lie you posted, we will keep waiting. Post a link showing where i was factually wrong
we have been laughing and waiting, its hilarious you cant
facts destroy you again
 
I'm sure I'm not the only noticing how he is refusing to do that. :eek:

of course not nobody falls for this act, it was clear as day as soon as i made post 8 and he hurried up and try to change his post thinking he would get caught

page after pager all he has to do is point out what i factually got wrong and NOTHING:lamo
 
Back
Top Bottom