• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Black America's True Nemesis: Liberals, Not Zimmerman [W:54]

Wehrwolfen

Banned
Joined
May 11, 2013
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
402
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
By Lloyd Marcus
July 25, 2013

In the midst of all the racial hullabaloo stirred up by so-called advocates for black empowerment after the Zimmerman trail, guess who is really being harmed? Answer: black America.

All of you black pastors, black politicians, and black celebs who have joined Sharpton and the MSM's lynch mob to "get Zimmerman" should be ashamed of yourselves. You are doing a huge disservice to the very people you claim to champion by chasing a straw man while ignoring the real issues that are devastating black America.

Everyone knows that the black community is a mess. White folks ain't killin' us. We are killing each other (http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/337929/war-against-black-men-lee-habeeb). Over 70 and increasing percent of black kids grow up in fatherless homes(Children in single-parent families by race | KIDS COUNT Data Center). Researchers warn that we blacks are aborting ourselves(www.learninc.org - ALARMING TREND: DECLINING NUMBER OF BLACK BIRTHS) into extinction. Black school dropout rates are at epidemic levels. Fatherless households and school dropouts fuel through the roof high black unemployment, gangs, and incarcerations.


Read more:
Articles: Black America's True Nemesis: Liberals, Not Zimmerman

Most all racist Progressives will dispute thie about article written by Marcus Lloyd.
 
By Lloyd Marcus
July 25, 2013

In the midst of all the racial hullabaloo stirred up by so-called advocates for black empowerment after the Zimmerman trail, guess who is really being harmed? Answer: black America.

All of you black pastors, black politicians, and black celebs who have joined Sharpton and the MSM's lynch mob to "get Zimmerman" should be ashamed of yourselves. You are doing a huge disservice to the very people you claim to champion by chasing a straw man while ignoring the real issues that are devastating black America.

Everyone knows that the black community is a mess. White folks ain't killin' us. We are killing each other (http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/337929/war-against-black-men-lee-habeeb). Over 70 and increasing percent of black kids grow up in fatherless homes(Children in single-parent families by race | KIDS COUNT Data Center). Researchers warn that we blacks are aborting ourselves(www.learninc.org - ALARMING TREND: DECLINING NUMBER OF BLACK BIRTHS) into extinction. Black school dropout rates are at epidemic levels. Fatherless households and school dropouts fuel through the roof high black unemployment, gangs, and incarcerations.


Read more:
Articles: Black America's True Nemesis: Liberals, Not Zimmerman

Most all racist Progressives will dispute thie about article written by Marcus Lloyd.




The American Thinker, which you link to, is a far right, partisan rag which is not recognized as a reliable source for anything.




"Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch, running out of time, GOP.
 
Wow two strikes on that post. American Thinker and Marcus Lloyd an unhyphenated American both Conservative. Horrors.
 
By Lloyd Marcus
July 25, 2013

In the midst of all the racial hullabaloo stirred up by so-called advocates for black empowerment after the Zimmerman trail, guess who is really being harmed? Answer: black America.

All of you black pastors, black politicians, and black celebs who have joined Sharpton and the MSM's lynch mob to "get Zimmerman" should be ashamed of yourselves. You are doing a huge disservice to the very people you claim to champion by chasing a straw man while ignoring the real issues that are devastating black America.

Everyone knows that the black community is a mess. White folks ain't killin' us. We are killing each other (http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/337929/war-against-black-men-lee-habeeb). Over 70 and increasing percent of black kids grow up in fatherless homes(Children in single-parent families by race | KIDS COUNT Data Center). Researchers warn that we blacks are aborting ourselves(www.learninc.org - ALARMING TREND: DECLINING NUMBER OF BLACK BIRTHS) into extinction. Black school dropout rates are at epidemic levels. Fatherless households and school dropouts fuel through the roof high black unemployment, gangs, and incarcerations.


Read more:
Articles: Black America's True Nemesis: Liberals, Not Zimmerman

Most all racist Progressives will dispute thie about article written by Marcus Lloyd.


conservative racism has no limit l think
 
conservative racism has no limit l think

Of course you're alluding to the manner in which they tried to prejudge and lynch George Zimmerman. Why if it weren't for the calming of the situation by people like Obama, Sharpton and Jackson all from the left this guy would still be persecuted.
 
Are you claiming now that black men are liars or only black conservative men?
No one person speaks for all blacks, not even a black person. He has a right to his own opinion, he doesn't have a right to determine the facts.
 
Of course you're alluding to the manner in which they tried to prejudge and lynch George Zimmerman. Why if it weren't for the calming of the situation by people like Obama, Sharpton and Jackson all from the left this guy would still be persecuted.

a few strong black politicans disturb you (and many others ?
 
Are you claiming now that black men are liars or only black conservative men?

No, not black conservatives, all conservatives. Just like white liberals lie and black liberals lie.

Conservatives (irrespective of color) lie up to a point/creatively edit/cherry pick facts to try to show that their preconceived notions about a certain subject is the truth.

Liberals (irrespective of color) are just as bad.
 
No, not black conservatives, all conservatives. Just like white liberals lie and black liberals lie.

Conservatives (irrespective of color) lie up to a point/creatively edit/cherry pick facts to try to show that their preconceived notions about a certain subject is the truth.

Liberals (irrespective of color) are just as bad.

Throw all the bums out.
 
In the midst of all the racial hullabaloo stirred up by so-called advocates for black empowerment after the Zimmerman trail, guess who is really being harmed? Answer: black America.

I don't know much about the pulication or the author so I'll reserve my comments on them and instead focus on the content of the article.

Trayvon Martin is a "documented thug" because he drew on a desk, got caught with a dime bag, and was tardy to school?

LMAO.

Seriously?

I stopped there because when judging an article on content I usually stop reading when it goes full f***ing retard.

Everyone knows you don't go full f***ing retard.
 
I don't know much about the pulication or the author so I'll reserve my comments on them and instead focus on the content of the article.

Trayvon Martin is a "documented thug" because he drew on a desk, got caught with a dime bag, and was tardy to school?

LMAO.

Seriously?

I stopped there because when judging an article on content I usually stop reading when it goes full f***ing retard.

Everyone knows you don't go full f***ing retard.

So you claim that the race hustling whores stirring up racial hatred is not harming Black people?

I wonder, did you just happen to forget that there were several pieces of woman's jewelry and watches found in Trayvon's backpack by the police along with a heavy duty flathead screwdriver which was viewed as a burglary tool.
 
So you claim that the race hustling whores stirring up racial hatred is not harming Black people?

Did I claim that somewhere?

I just went back and read my response to this thread and I didn't say anything in defense of "race hustling whores", didn't say anything about them at all as far as it goes.

Maybe you're mistaking me for an entirely different member with whom you're having an entirely different conversation in an entirely different thread?

What I did say was that this article began by assuming an outrageous premise so I stopped reading it. Nothing more, nothing less. I gave it an honest chance and got as far as the high rhetoric of Martin being a "documented thug", which he quite certainly wasn't and decided not to waste my time with it any further because if it starts with a lie there's a good chance it's going to continue with lies. Maybe that didn't happen. Maybe after setting the stage by trotting out all manner of nonsense the author flipped his strategy and made some good points using substantiated facts. I wouldn;t know because I wasn't going to waste my time finding out.

Now, was Martin a perfect angel? No, not by any means. He was a little bit of a trouble maker. What back in the 70s when I grew up we would have called "high strung".

I guess in today's "zero tollerance" environment a kid who doesn't toe the established party line is assumed to be a thug. But I don't buy "zero tollerance" and I don't buy labeling kids as thugs because of it. No more than I would consider a kid a thug if he wore an NRA tee shirt to school and had a water pistol in his pocket, also apparent hanging offenses in this day and age.

I wonder, did you just happen to forget that there were several pieces of woman's jewelry and watches found in Trayvon's backpack by the police along with a heavy duty flathead screwdriver which was viewed as a burglary tool.

Did I forget?

No.

I wonder, did you just happen to forget that those pieces of jewlery were never proven to have been stolen from someone, and that screwdriver was never proven to have been used in a burglary, nor was Martin even implicated in a crime associated either with stolen jewlery or related to burglary.

I got pulled over by the police one time for making an improper turn.

Sitting on the back seat of my Jeep was a plastic baggy containing some plant material.

Cop "viewed" it as drugs so he arrested me.

Bruought the dog out and had him scratch my car up real good sniffing for "more dope".

Didn't find anything.

Hauled me down to the station.

Gave me a breathalizer; no booze in my system.

Had me pee in a bootle and sent that, along with the "plant material" off to the lab.

Results come back, no drugs in my system, plant material isn't a CDS.

The bag actually contained some dried Kelp or seeweed. When you buy Blood Worms or Sand Worms as bait down the Jersey shore the tackle shops usually pack them in flimsy cardboard boxes containing the worms and some damp plant material to keep them moist and alive. Those boxes essentially disintigrate and fall apart when they get wet (which is gonna happen when you're baiting hooks on the beach at 0300) so I learned long ago to bring a ziploc baggy with me when I fish live bait and I transfer my worms from the box to a bag.

Somehow the baggy ended up on my back seat, the cop saw the baggy, and "viewd" it as evidence of a crime and me as a criminal.

So I know from personal experience that "authority figures" are not always going to make an honest assessment. When they "view" soemthing that could potentially be the result of a crime, or the means of commiting a crime, or a potential crime in and of itself, they're going to "view" it as a crime and investigate accordingly.

I prefer to wait for the result of that investigation to be released before I to just on the "viewing "x" as a crime" bandwagon.

So Martin had a bag of jewlery and a screwdriver. Either PROVE those objects were associated with some crime or shutup about them.
 
The American Thinker, which you link to, is a far right, partisan rag which is not recognized as a reliable source for anything. ...


.

....by liberals. Among conservatives, it is viewed very highly, because of brilliant essays like the one in the OP.
 
I don't know much about the pulication or the author so I'll reserve my comments on them and instead focus on the content of the article.

Trayvon Martin is a "documented thug" because he drew on a desk, got caught with a dime bag, and was tardy to school?

LMAO.

Seriously?

I stopped there because when judging an article on content I usually stop reading when it goes full f***ing retard.

Everyone knows you don't go full f***ing retard.

Not what the linked article said. ( Too 'retarded' to read it??) . Thug is a very subjective word , but there is a plenty of evidence besides that one aricle that he was one.
 
No one person speaks for all blacks, not even a black person. He has a right to his own opinion, he doesn't have a right to determine the facts.

fact: 72% of black babies are born to unwed mothers http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_01.pdf

fact: according to US census data, latest figures show an abortion rate (all abortions) of 19.5/1000. abortion rate among black women 48.2/1000. more than double

Family Planning, Abortions - The 2012 Statistical Abstract - U.S. Census Bureau


fact: Over the past five years, dropout rates for Blacks/African Americans and Latinos in the region have remained at least three times as high as dropout rates for Whites and Asians.

High School Dropout Rates | Education | The State of Equity in Metro Boston

sorry..but just because you don't like something (or the source it comes from) doesn't mean it is not a fact
 
....by liberals.
Among conservatives, it is viewed very highly, because of brilliant essays like the one in the OP.




You are joking, right?




"Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch, running out of time, GOP.
 
Not what the linked article said. ( Too 'retarded' to read it??).

Actually I did up to the point that I've already said I stopped reading it.

The article said, and I quote: "Yes, Martin's history documents that he was a thug." in the last sentence of the fifth paragraph.

The statement "...he was a thug." hyperlinks to a Blaze article titled, "Revealed: Trayvon Martin’s Suspension Record, George Zimmerman’s Statement to Police".

Since the phrase "...he was a thug." was linked to that article I take it as a matter of faith that the linked article will substantiate the claim that Martin was thug.

Makes sense, right? I do some professional writting and that's the standard I'm held to.

But the Blaze article doesn't actually substantiate that Martin was a "thug". It mentions that he was suspended from school for "vandalisim" (which other sources will tell you amounted to Martin scribbling “W.T.F” on a school door with a magic marker - a depraved criminal act if ever there was one, about what you would expect from a "thug"), and it brings up the empty dime bag he was arrested with (the horror!), and it also mentions the jewlery and “burglary tool” (screwdriver) but goes on to say that a police investigation was never able to establish that these items actually ever even belonged to Martin.

Did you read that far? Did you click the links in the OP article to determine what sources the OP was relying on to substantiate the claims he's making? Did you follow up by searching for further articles to find out just wtah's meant by the charge of "vandalisim" and how serious an act of vandalisim it was?

No?

Of course not.

Because you read it on the Internet in American "Thinker" (LOL) and as we all know, if you read it on the Internet it has to be true!!!

Now, what was that you were saying about being to retarded to read?

LMAO.

You just got OWNED.

Thug is a very subjective word , but there is a plenty of evidence besides that one aricle that he was one.

Actually, no, there isn't.

There's evidence that Martin wrote on a door, smoked some weed, and was investigated in relation to but never actually charged with a potentially more serious crime, in fact he was never tied to that crime in any way other than having been a potential suspect for a brief period of time.

I know thugs, and they woould eat Trayvon Martin for breakfast.
 
You are joking, right?




"Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch, running out of time, GOP.

( Groan) Well we are all anxioulsy awaiting your scathing rebuttal to the essay. I mean it's so stupid you should be able to pick it clean in 5 minutes right?
 
Actually I did up to the point that I've already said I stopped reading it.

The article said, and I quote: "Yes, Martin's history documents that he was a thug." in the last sentence of the fifth paragraph.

The statement "...he was a thug." hyperlinks to a Blaze article titled, "Revealed: Trayvon Martin’s Suspension Record, George Zimmerman’s Statement to Police".

Since the phrase "...he was a thug." was linked to that article I take it as a matter of faith that the linked article will substantiate the claim that Martin was thug.

Makes sense, right? I do some professional writting and that's the standard I'm held to.

But the Blaze article doesn't actually substantiate that Martin was a "thug". It mentions that he was suspended from school for "vandalisim" (which other sources will tell you amounted to Martin scribbling “W.T.F” on a school door with a magic marker - a depraved criminal act if ever there was one, about what you would expect from a "thug"), and it brings up the empty dime bag he was arrested with (the horror!), and it also mentions the jewlery and “burglary tool” (screwdriver) but goes on to say that a police investigation was never able to establish that these items actually ever even belonged to Martin.

Did you read that far? Did you click the links in the OP article to determine what sources the OP was relying on to substantiate the claims he's making? Did you follow up by searching for further articles to find out just wtah's meant by the charge of "vandalisim" and how serious an act of vandalisim it was?

No?

Of course not.

Because you read it on the Internet in American "Thinker" (LOL) and as we all know, if you read it on the Internet it has to be true!!!

Now, what was that you were saying about being to retarded to read?

LMAO.

You just got OWNED.



Actually, no, there isn't.

There's evidence that Martin wrote on a door, smoked some weed, and was investigated in relation to but never actually charged with a potentially more serious crime, in fact he was never tied to that crime in any way other than having been a potential suspect for a brief period of time.

I know thugs, and they woould eat Trayvon Martin for breakfast.

I know Insufferably pompous pandering liberals might not think such actions ' prove' he was a thug, but to many folks , ( and I'm guessing Lloyd MArcus is one of them ) it's enough. Good kids don't get caught with stolen jewelry and break in tools in their backpacks. This isn't a trial- Marcus doesn't have to prove he was involved in robbing houses beyong a reasonable doubt. The evidence is plenty to conclude he was a little thug.
 
Back
Top Bottom