• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Surprise Surprise [W:129]

The timing seems pretty convenient, don't you think? And though you've played hero--as would most decent people--it's pretty rare when one can.... apart from the police, military and firefighters.

Should Zimmerman have thought "Oh my god it is too son after the trial so I cannot do anything to help these people."

Only his detractors will think like that.

Do you think he was in control of the timing?
 
I'm not trashing anyone's rights, humanity, or otherwise... just pointing out hypocrisy. It applies to both sides of the issue.

What is true, invariably in ALL issues, even the simplest, and uncomplicated ones, is that there is ALWAYS INEXACTITUDE, and even HYPOCRISY on BOTH sides.

The ESSENTIAL POINT is the RELATIVE degree of INEXACTITUDE & HYPOCRISY of both of the sides.

So when the "fence sitters" want to dance their way out of a meaningful statement .....or, more usually, the side that has the OVERWHELMING amount of INEXACTITUDE, and HYPOCRISY on THEIR SIDE .......that is when statements such as "both sides of the issue are at fault" are made. That is done to OBFUSCATE and PURPOSELY DISTORT the TRUTH.

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY ZERO DOUBT that the Black Racist Swine, and their Black Racist Enabling DEM Lib/Gay turds are maligning Z UNJUSTLY, and even threatening Z with MURDER in spite of the FACT that Z got a verdict of "NOT GUILTY" in a Trial that anyone of any note (ON BOTH SIDES) found that there wasn't any legal impropriety.
 
And you would have done the same thing in his position.

Above is Mason's response to Campbell's post:"It makes him guilty of going armed, following a teen ager, allowing a confrontation then because he couldn't take an old fashioned ass kicking murdering the boy."

MY RESPONSE:

Of course NOT, Mason !!!. Any sentient person would prefer to have his face pummeled and his skull crushed against the cement !!!
 
Moderator's Warning:
People... cease the over the top baiting.
 
Back
Top Bottom