• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

for all posters zimmerman , guilty or innocent ?

zimmerman is guilty ?


  • Total voters
    31
Medusa. Shame on you.

He is not guilty. He was found not guilty. You have absolutely positively no evidence to prove his guilty, and yet you think he is. You didn't watch the trial. You didn't look at all the evidence. You didn't read the testimony. You should be ashamed.

Some day "they" may come for YOU.



This​ detail you know. And a frillion is an understatement.





Well I did watch most of the trial, and I still think that he is guilty as hell.....They found him Not Guilty, but that doesn't mean that he is innocent....As I've said before--Zimmerman is a liar, a killer and a coward.....
 
Let the record show that 3 of the 4 people who voted "guilty" did it with their tongues firmly in their cheeks.



Hahaha--I'm the one with the tongue straight out....
 
Even with people skewing the poll by voting for all of them, it's still a massive landslide for Zimmerman.
 
Look Medusa, the forum has been discussing this since it happenned and you apparently can't be bothered to read any of that but would rather do this uninformed drive by. Ridiculous. :roll:



Why are you reading it and responding then?
 
Medusa. Shame on you.

He is not guilty. He was found not guilty. You have absolutely positively no evidence to prove his guilty, and yet you think he is. You didn't watch the trial. You didn't look at all the evidence. You didn't read the testimony. You should be ashamed.

Some day "they" may come for YOU.



This​ detail you know. And a frillion is an understatement.

shame on americans who agree with me too ?
 
Well I did watch most of the trial, and I still think that he is guilty as hell.....They found him Not Guilty, but that doesn't mean that he is innocent....As I've said before--Zimmerman is a liar, a killer and a coward.....


yes.......
 
Well I did watch most of the trial, and I still think that he is guilty as hell.....They found him Not Guilty, but that doesn't mean that he is innocent....As I've said before--Zimmerman is a liar, a killer and a coward.....

Your opinion doesn't matter.
 
why maggie ?

Because you've demonstrated you not only don't know the facts of the case, but have made up your own to suit your own narrative. Couple that with your refusal to comport with basic forum etiquette and read up on what had gone before (so you don't come in rehashing what has been debated ad infinitum).
 
why maggie ?

Because she watched "most" of the trial. First, I don't believe that. Second, and most important? It doesn't matter because she wasn't on the jury. I realize that's an unclear concept for many of us here, but the only thing that matters is what the jury found. And the jury found him Not Guilty.
 
Because you've demonstrated you not only don't know the facts of the case, but have made up your own to suit your own narrative. Couple that with your refusal to comport with basic forum etiquette and read up on what had gone before (so you don't come in rehashing what has been debated ad infinitum).

like some americans who believe he is guilty ?

what a pity

people who defend martin are called either misinformed or race baiter
 
Why are you reading it and responding then?

Huh? Because when someone drops a turd in the community punchbowl the offender gets called out. That's why. At least a thousand threads on this over the lifetime of the case, a year's worth of debate and discussion, links and sources. And most recently four or five still very active threads regarding just this topic (only by the more informed).

That makes this either a blatant troll thread or so hopelessly out of date on the issue as to render anything he has to say spam.
 
people who defend martin are called either misinformed or race baiter

In this case, you are CLEARLY misinformed, both about the case, probably about our legal system as well. Watch the video I posted. Tell me how it is wrong.

I had never even heard the 'lean' story that it mentions, so the media did indeed do a hell of a lot of digging and announcing of Z's past, but hushed up anything about M's past...
 
Back
Top Bottom