• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The "Racism" of George Zimmerman [W:21]

why do libertarians call everybody who defens a black race baiter?

as if they are so so liberal

Why do you lump all libertarians together as if they're a monolithic group?
 
why do libertarians call everybody who defens a black race baiter?

as if they are so so liberal

:sigh:

*stares at nota*
 
Eeeeek, why are you looking at me, Josie?!
 
I think part of the "untalkability" of the race thing is the Southern refusal to admit the scale of slavery in the prewar South......................
 
Why do you lump all libertarians together as if they're a monolithic group?

Because she does not understand.

Some folks just look for quick and inaccurate labels for everyone else.
 
Because she does not understand.

Some folks just look for quick and inaccurate labels for everyone else.

Too bad that shortcuts often lead to stereotyping.
 
Actually, I feel a little guilty for fooling around here so much. :3oops:

But thank you.
 
In New England, the cops are investigated if they cause the death of someone. In FL, NW wannabees are free to gun anyone down. That isn't a legal variance, that's another country.........................
 
In New England, the cops are investigated if they cause the death of someone. In FL, NW wannabees are free to gun anyone down. That isn't a legal variance, that's another country.........................

Come on, even you must know that isn't the case. :roll:
 
Medusa, so I take it you failed to research any of the facts relating to the case before injecting your emotional opinion based on bogus talking points?

It's widely accepted that the witnesses were all poisoned by the Sanford police department, who assumed Zimmermans innocence on the scene and gave the witnesses information about the event. Many witnesses weren't even questioned the day of, and a complete canvas on the neighbourhood wasn't completed.
 
It's widely accepted that the witnesses were all poisoned by the Sanford police department, who assumed Zimmermans innocence on the scene and gave the witnesses information about the event. Many witnesses weren't even questioned the day of, and a complete canvas on the neighbourhood wasn't completed.
So you are a conspiracy theorist?

Which witness who called 911 was not questioned?
Which eye witness was not questioned?
 
It's widely accepted that the witnesses were all poisoned by the Sanford police department, who assumed Zimmermans innocence on the scene and gave the witnesses information about the event. Many witnesses weren't even questioned the day of, and a complete canvas on the neighbourhood wasn't completed.

No, it is not widely accepted at all. Rather, it is part of your overall fantasy tale.
 
what does it differ whether he is racist or not

he killed a child.

Obama has enabled the killing of more children, through all the US interventions in the Middle East.
 
We have a large Hispanic population here. :)

And anyway, you're implying that I meant there shouldn't have been an investigation if Martin was white. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying the race baiters in this country wouldn't have cared about Martin if he was white, therefore, it wouldn't have become national news.

Good morning, Josie. :2wave:

:agree: Maybe if evolution one day makes us all green, that would solve the problem of who to hate because of their color? Until then, I guess we'll just have to ignore the race baiters, and maybe they'll go away! :shrug:
 
It's widely accepted that the witnesses were all poisoned by the Sanford police department, who assumed Zimmermans innocence on the scene and gave the witnesses information about the event. Many witnesses weren't even questioned the day of, and a complete canvas on the neighbourhood wasn't completed.

Links please. I haven't read any source that indicates that the witnesses were all "poisoned," much less that there is wide acceptance of this opinion.
 
Back
Top Bottom