• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The left wing media just CANNOT stop lying about George Zimmerman

Nope, just relevant to his IQ, assumed training as a NW volunteer, and escalation.
Nice to know cops have no authority.
Off to rob a bank... ciao

So, his IQ is on trial now? Must be a liberal intellectual elitist. Robbing people, as you claim to be intent on doing, would fit that stereotype if I were to "profile" it.
 
Look, my point here is this. If someone is creeping on me while walking, minding my own business... they will be confronted, because I WILL feel threatened. I think anyone would.

Your point is understood.
Your point is irrelevant.

Creeping is not a crime, are you suggesting it should be?
Confronting someone is also not a crime, are you suggesting it should be?

TM assaulted GZ physically, are you suggesting that should NOT be a crime?
Are you suggesting being physically assaulted is not a potential reason to use deadly force to defend yourself?
 
Any twit, especially one given NW training, knows that cops don't want civilians involved. You are all addicted to the tube... has watching "Cops" taught you nothing?

Splitting hairs on technicalities is weak.

If he didn't follow, how the hell did he get "ambushed" as sooooo many keep saying? "the thug ambushed him".

Look, my point here is this. If someone is creeping on me while walking, minding my own business... they will be confronted, because I WILL feel threatened. I think anyone would.

Total BS.
The cops don't want NW people to confront people but that is entirely differnt from following them or keping an eye on them.

All the evidence is that he did get ambushed. The scenario where Zimmerman somehow accosted or chased MArtin is completely implausible given the timeline. Completely. But even that is amoot moot, if you atack somebody in the manner you said, they legally have the right to defend themselves just as Zimmerman did.
 
If he didn't follow, how the hell did he get "ambushed" as sooooo many keep saying? "the thug ambushed him".
ne would.

He did follow, but not after he was advised not to( at least that was the unrefuted testimony entered into evidence) . He was already out of his vehicle at the time when the operator advised him " we don't need you to do that" .
From that time , and given the location of the incident, Martin would EASILY have made it home without incident if he was in fact going home. But he obvioulsy had other ideas, didn't he?
 
What would the legal basis of Mr. Zimmerman's lawsuit be ?

Did you not here how NBC edited the 911 call? And the constant misreporting about him being told to "stay in the car", which was never uttered? He's been painted as the aggressor almost entirely by the media, and there is no proof whatsoever that this was the case.
 
Look, my point here is this. If someone is creeping on me while walking, minding my own business... they will be confronted, because I WILL feel threatened. I think anyone would.

That isn't really relevant though.

Both Zimmerman and Martin were both well within their rights up until Martin's confrontation of Zimmerman.

Martin wasn't within his rights when he beat Zimmerman senseless over it.

Trayvon Martin could have just as easily called the cops himself.

He choose to attack Zimmerman instead. That's where he erred.
 
Well, heck. I guess if we just start ignoring the findings of courts and trials I guess we can just disband them and go for the lynch mob way.
Yeah. Just like life is like throughout Africa. It's not called a lynch mob there. It called simply getting the day in doing what your ancestors have been doing since the beginning of time.
What's happening in every 'inner city in America is no different now. Just different weapons and clothing.
 
Zimmerman juror B #37 the animal rescuer whose husband is an attorney, has signed on to write book.
Sooooooo?
YOU wrote a couple of 'vanity press' books right? How many 'editions are there BTW. Can we still find one? LOLOLO.
My niece has almost completed her book on how mentally deranged/very lonely/discarded people by society show up on forums. And how it's their only outlet. Otherwise they'd be sitting in a rubber room.
My point is it's a free country and any one can write a book about anything they want to right?
 
Martin didn't cause the incident.. George did.. and I am not quite sure I would have lead George to my house.
T had four minutes to run off into the darkness. Instead he choose to return and begin a felony assault on George. Very bad decision. Obviously George didn't know exactly where T went....in the dark....in the rain.
You can continue to put up silly assumptions. YOU posted you would "let it go" in another post yet you appear to have lied. Guess what dear. The ALL WOMEN jury
George!
 
Absolutely agree!!!!!
 
He did follow, but not after he was advised not to( at least that was the unrefuted testimony entered into evidence) . He was already out of his vehicle at the time when the operator advised him " we don't need you to do that" .
From that time , and given the location of the incident, Martin would EASILY have made it home without incident if he was in fact going home. But he obvioulsy had other ideas, didn't he?

Ya, like who is this creepy crazy f*ck following me?
 
Back
Top Bottom