• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

FBI records: agents found no evidence that Zimmerman was racist

Who, or what, is Trevor Dooley?
trfjr said:
yes maybe then it will make people to think twice before punching someone for no legitimate reason
still waiting for your answer about Trevor Dooley
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
Who, or what, is Trevor Dooley?
Click to expand...

then why wasn't Trevor Dooley not arrested on the spot why did it take two year before he was charged with a crime

Trevor Dooley (black) walked out of his suburban house Sunday afternoon, past his trimmed lawn and nice landscaping, to confront a boy riding a skateboard on the basketball court across the street. That's against the rules in this neighborhood, and Dooley, 69, was carrying a gun.

David James, 41, (white) with 20 years in the Air Force, was playing basketball with his 8-year-old daughter. They played every Sunday

James stood up for the skateboarder, neighbors said. The men argued and got into a "physical confrontation," the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office said. Then, in front of his daughter, James was shot dead.

What authorities don't know is who pulled the trigger, or whether it was justified.

The Sheriff's Office has not named Dooley as a suspect or charged him with a crime. When police arrived around 4 p.m., he was waiting with the dead man. He invoked his right to remain silent and called his lawyer.

"We haven't named him yet as a suspect. I'm not going to say he's not," said sheriff's Col. Albert Frost. "We have various witnesses and various conflicting statements at this point to start with. Obviously, that doesn't help us. We're trying to sort out the facts and trying to determine what really happened."

So Dooley went back to work Monday morning, driving a school bus loaded with kids.
Click to expand...


Aftermath of deadly shooting in Valrico leaves community bewildered | Tampa Bay Times
it took over two years befor Trevor Dooley was charged with a crime. where were the protest in the streets
 
I dunno, sounds like he should have been arrested. I have no problem with not arresting someone until the appropriate time if they dont skip out and are properly watched. I am not sure I understand exactly what you are asking me.
trfjr said:
then why wasn't Trevor Dooley not arrested on the spot why did it take two year before he was charged with a crime




Aftermath of deadly shooting in Valrico leaves community bewildered | Tampa Bay Times
it took over two years befor Trevor Dooley was charged with a crime. where were the protest in the streets
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
I dunno, sounds like he should have been arrested. I have no problem with not arresting someone until the appropriate time if they dont skip out and are properly watched. I am not sure I understand exactly what you are asking me.
Click to expand...

compare two years to 45 days for the arrest of Zimmerman i do beleave


what im asking where was the protest to have Mr Dooley arrested

And pointing out the Fact that it wasn't Zimmerman being white that kept him from arrest that the race baiter want you to believe
 
Last edited:
WCH said:
FBI records: agents found no evidence that Zimmerman was racist | McClatchy

After interviewing nearly three dozen people in the George Zimmerman murder case, the FBI found no evidence that racial bias was a motivating factor in the shooting of Trayvon Martin, records released Thursday show.

Even the lead detective in the case, Sanford Det. Chris Serino, told agents that he thought Zimmerman profiled Trayvon because of his attire and the circumstances — but not his race.

Serino saw Zimmerman as “having little hero complex, but not as a racist.”

The Duval County State Attorney released another collection of evidence in the Zimmerman murder case Thursday, including reports from FBI agents who investigated whether any racial bias was involved in Trayvon’s Feb. 26 killing.

The evidence includes bank surveillance videos from the day of the killing, crime scene photos and memos from prosecutors
Click to expand...

If the feds decide to file a case I am sure they will discount their own report as preliminary and go ahead with the case. There is no integrity where the feds are concerned.
 
mak2 said:
Better bring a gun, they are pretty big kids now. Bloody and broken, what a joke.
Click to expand...

Martin was big too, and Zimmerman had very Little fighting skills. Sounds like a one sided fight to me.

Are you of the opinión that somebody cannot kill somebody else by hitting them with their fists?
 
Nope, never said that.
Mason66 said:
Martin was big too, and Zimmerman had very Little fighting skills. Sounds like a one sided fight to me.

Are you of the opinión that somebody cannot kill somebody else by hitting them with their fists?
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
At 17 going to get skittles and tea a mile away? yea, I would probably have allowed my 17 year old to walk over to the convience store. It would not take much imagination to read into this post. He had pot in his system, thus the skittles, THC really dosnt make one a raving luntic, wasnt that Reefer Madness?
Click to expand...

Simple question man. Do you supervise your kids and teach them right? I'm trying to paint you in a good light. Don't fight to be in the Trayvon Martin parent section man. That ain't a good place to be. I know them (the type). I taught their kids (the type).

Are you telling me your kid would be ok to go out if he was high?
 
Well thank you, but I dont think I really need painted. I would not knowingly allow my 17 year old to get high. But tell me, what exaclty does this mean? "I know them (the type). I taught their kids (the type)."
stonewall50 said:
Simple question man. Do you supervise your kids and teach them right? I'm trying to paint you in a good light. Don't fight to be in the Trayvon Martin parent section man. That ain't a good place to be. I know them (the type). I taught their kids (the type).

Are you telling me your kid would be ok to go out if he was high?
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
An unarmed minor was shot and killed, there was very little evidence one way or the other, and you dont think there was any reason for a trial? I think this is the hardest part of the Z peoples point for me to understand. Couse I have two boys about that age at home, well a year ago I did.
Click to expand...
Wait...read your first sentence again...

There was 'very little evidence' so...**** it...lets have a trial! How does that even make sense?

Contrary to your statement there wasnt 'very little evidence.' There was plenty of evidence as to the events of the night. We KNOW...
1-17 y/o male was walking home late at night in a community he was not known to live in
2-17 y/o male was spotted by a man that has been on the neighborhood watch.
3-17 y/o male was not recognized by neighborhood watch member
4-Neighborhood watch member called police dispatch and followed (at a distance). Unwise...but still...
5-Girl friend (acquaintance) of 17 y/o male stated he was aware of the 'creepy ass cracker', was angry, and despite her saying "run home, Forrest!" the 17 year old circled back, hiding his approach and then violently confronted the neighborhood watchman.
6-Witnesses testified that the 17 y/o male was on top beating the neighborhood watchman
7-Police photographs showed cuts and abrasions to the front and back of the neighborhood watchmans head

What evidence is there clearly indicates this should never have been brought to trial.
 
Well, unless you want to consider the unarmed dead kid. We know Z shot and killed an unarmed minor, there was not an overwhelming amount of evidecne it was a justifiable shooting. I guess I did word that a bit wrong. I must not be expresssing myself very well. I have alwasy thought it should have come up for trial.
VanceMack said:
Wait...read your first sentence again...

There was 'very little evidence' so...**** it...lets have a trial! How does that even make sense?

Contrary to your statement there wasnt 'very little evidence.' There was plenty of evidence as to the events of the night. We KNOW...
1-17 y/o male was walking home late at night in a community he was not known to live in
2-17 y/o male was spotted by a man that has been on the neighborhood watch.
3-17 y/o male was not recognized by neighborhood watch member
4-Neighborhood watch member called police dispatch and followed (at a distance). Unwise...but still...
5-Girl friend (acquaintance) of 17 y/o male stated he was aware of the 'creepy ass cracker', was angry, and despite her saying "run home, Forrest!" the 17 year old circled back, hiding his approach and then violently confronted the neighborhood watchman.
6-Witnesses testified that the 17 y/o male was on top beating the neighborhood watchman
7-Police photographs showed cuts and abrasions to the front and back of the neighborhood watchmans head

What evidence is there clearly indicates this should never have been brought to trial.
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
Well, unless you want to consider the unarmed dead kid. We know Z shot and killed an unarmed minor, there was not an overwhelming amount of evidecne it was a justifiable shooting. I guess I did word that a bit wrong. I must not be expresssing myself very well. I have alwasy thought it should have come up for trial.
Click to expand...
The trial system does not exist to prove what might not have happened. It exists to prove what did happen. If there is no evidence to prove Zimmerman guilty of something there should be no trial, regardless of the cute little 12 year old cherub faced boy we were offered as a 'victim'.
 
Zimmerman did something there was a dead unarmed minor.
VanceMack said:
The trial system does not exist to prove what might not have happened. It exists to prove what did happen. If there is no evidence to prove Zimmerman guilty of something there should be no trial, regardless of the cute little 12 year old cherub faced boy we were offered as a 'victim'.
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
Zimmerman did something there was a dead unarmed minor.
Click to expand...
Yes. Zimmerman responded to getting attacked and beaten by the 'unarmed minor'.
 
Ok, that seems to be what the jury thought too. But it was not glaringly obvious to the police at the time. Couldnt have been because even after the trial it is still just zimmermans word for the most part.
VanceMack said:
Yes. Zimmerman responded to getting attacked and beaten by the 'unarmed minor'.
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
Ok, that seems to be what the jury thought too. But it was not glaringly obvious to the police at the time. Couldnt have been because even after the trial it is still just zimmermans word for the most part.
Click to expand...
It WAS glaringly obvious to the police which is why they didnt arrest him or file charges. It took some 40+ days AND political involvement in order for them to force the locals into an arrest. It took replacing the prosecution team and political pressure to force a trial...a trial they probably knew up front they were going to lose. how could they win? They had no case. You arent SUPPOSED to be able to convict someone for a crime based on an emotional appeal.
 
mak2 said:
Well thank you, but I dont think I really need painted. I would not knowingly allow my 17 year old to get high. But tell me, what exaclty does this mean? "I know them (the type). I taught their kids (the type)."
Click to expand...

The type of parents who dont discipline their kids. The ones who dump their kid off on the other parent. The ones who essentially create a suspension magnet of a child. A thief and a drug user. Check his criminal record.

What did you think I mean? We're you going to try to pin racism on me? You knew damn well what I meant. Don't try to tell me you subscribe to the Martin way of raising kids.
 
WCH said:
After interviewing nearly three dozen people in the George Zimmerman murder case, the FBI found no evidence that racial bias was a motivating factor in the shooting of Trayvon Martin, records released Thursday show.
Click to expand...

The left is just going to tell you that's only proof that those agents hate black people.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom