Please move off the anal retentiveness of the "verdict". You said, he's not innocent, while claiming you knew the facts. I challenged you to prove he committed a crime using the facts of the case. You went right back to the anal retentiveness of a jury verdict and "not guilty". Look I gave you the benefit of the doubt you were able to discern the difference. Apparently not.
The jury proclaimed him "not guilty" that's a COMPLETELY separate issue. Juries don't decide if you are innocent. Arguing that he's NOT innocent in the PARTICULAR case is the reason the case went to trial, which was WRONG, since he was/has been/and ALWAYS WILL BE, innocent.
Btw, just FYI, there's talk of George Zimmerman filing a malicious prosecution suit against the state of Florida. For all you who want to jump in with the state has immunity. Not so fast, there is only limited immunity. Time will tell. I don't profess to be an attorney so I don't know the outcome or likelihood, just that it's being explored.
Head of the national association for the advancement of liberal colored people, aka the naalcp....ok ok ....naacp, has already asked DOJ to file civil rights charges. LOL Oops, FBI already did an exhaustive investigation, they found ZERO racial component to the case. I only wish there was a way to sue al sharpton and jesse jackson. I'd donate to that cause personally.