- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 42,744
- Reaction score
- 22,569
- Location
- Bonners Ferry ID USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I've noticed that a lot of experts have been saying that the sentencing for man slaughter is pretty much the same as murder 2. What I haven't heard was the reasoning that the sentencing is the same. There are two different definitions for both yet both are treated the same? Murder 2 is defined in such a way as to make one believe that it is more serious than man slaughter. So why would one carry just as much punishment as the other?