First, you're the same poster who claimed you didn't need a trial, judge, jury or law enforcement. YOU!!! could adjudicate the case just by LOOKING at GZ.
But we'll look beyond same.
"that he was carrying a gun when he shouldn't have been" - fact less personal hang up, he was a LEGAL CWP holder.
"followed Martin when he should NOT have" - as O'Mara pointed out in closing and I've said here on at least three occasions, SHOW a SINGLE piece of EVIDENCE, GZ "followed" TM **after** the NEN operator said "we don't need you to do that" and GZ replied "ok"
I believe the jury will hear GZ's words, as ALL of us watching the actual TRIAL have done. If you are going to claim there was ill will, hatred or malice in GZ's words, we aren't from the same planet.
"if he had not been the agressor, Martin would still be alive" Again, a personal hangup not the law. In fact one can be the initial aggressor, in fact one can START the fight, and still use self defense with lethal force. Sorry it's the LAW.