• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Day 11 testimony (Tuesday7/9)

Oceandan said:
Judge Nelson is not a happy camper. Defense needs a fire lit under them, GET READY and let her bring in the jury.
Click to expand...

In my opinion, the jury deserves to have all of these motions and **** argued outside of their time in the courtroom. If the players need to stay until Midnight to get this **** over with, then that's what should happen. The jury's lives are being interrupted big time. Time for the other players lives to be interrupted big time as well. It's been over an hour-and-a-half since the jury expected to be in the courtroom. That's unacceptable.
 
raindrop said:
I missed it.............is she letting in the animation?
Click to expand...

LOL She scheduled the "remainder" of the hearing AFTER court today. As MaggieD said and I agree, don't make the jury wait while you do all this minutia. Do it AFTER the jury has been excused. I actually admire Judge Nelson for her concern of the jury's time.
 
Oceandan said:
The defense wants to use a computer animation of the facts of the case and do what I assume would be a "walk through" for the jury.

The prosecution is fighting it.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure it's needed, really.
 
Someone tell me why I just don't like Defense Attorney West??
 
Oceandan said:
Someone tell me why I just don't like Defense Attorney West??
Click to expand...
"Hello Mr. Oceandan. Looks like you're in deep ****. We have two lawyers you can choose from: Bernie or West. You choose."
 
Anyone see the look on Bernie's face? He looks like he's having a pepto bismal moment.
 
West boring the hell out of everyone again...
 
I think it's kinda funny that the witness is bragging on how many dead bodies he has sliced and diced. LOL!

I hope I can stay awake through this.
 
Soot! One of Dr. Bao's favorite words! s-o-o-t
 
Whoa...this dude was on the Bloody Sunday case.
 
Dunno Spanky. According to Tony Pipitone tweeting from court, the jury is very engaged and interested in this specific testimony.

Apparently they started zoning out a bit yesterday during the voice ID witnesses.
 
That notes comment was a dig at Dr. Bao and letting the jury know how superior their expert is to the state's.
 
Josie said:
He doesn't smile at all.
Click to expand...
What you see, is what you get.

0d23e025-0678-4445-af02-54787d46288dnews.ap.org_r620x349.jpg
 
The expert just told the jury how to evaluate this case. Compare Zimmerman statements to the evidence on scene. I would assume, as he was called by defense, he will say it is a match.
 
Why is this important? I don't see the state objecting to the firing range being 2-4"?
 
spanky said:
Why is this important? I don't see the state objecting to the firing range being 2-4"?
Click to expand...

Once he ties it all together, you'll figure it out.
 
Wake me up when he does so.
 
I still don't get it, has any of this been previously refuted by the state?
 
spanky said:
I still don't get it, has any of this been previously refuted by the state?
Click to expand...

Yes, the state is saying that GZ was on top of TM.
 
Sorry for the divergence from the facts of the case but I have to insert this.

1.) I still say West appears as if he has a constant need for a bowel movement.

2.) I helped out at a local EMS/PD prepare for disaster event. To open the event we were treated to a free meal. It was put on by the......CORONER's office. Guess what they he served.
Steak. <grin>
 
Josie said:
Yes, the state is saying that GZ was on top of TM.
Click to expand...


Well, they had a couple witnesses who said that's what they thought but neither seemed credible on that point. W6 was closest, 17 feet or so and he positively put TM on top of Z.
 
Way too long on this testimony. I get so tired of boys playing games.

Establish his credibility: 5 minutes
Testify: 10 minutes

On to the next. Jesus.

(If he's not an expert witness, he shouldn't be testifying. The court should 'certify' him an expert without wasting the jury's time. When he comes to the stand, he's already certified. Brief credentials could be even LESS than 5 minutes.)

Stop wasting the jury's time!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom