• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Events From Nen Call To Verbal Argument

What if...? said:
I'm too lazy to start a thread, so I'll do this here.

I think the pross is gojng to go at it like this:

They're going to suggest that Z went down between the buildings.

That he came upon M in the dark and reflexively went for his gun.

That M saw this and believed Z was pulling a gun on him and THAT is why he attacked him. They fought for control of the gun, Z won, M died.

They're going to try to present it from the perspective of someone who doesn't have a "clean" self defense claim, and knows it.

What lie would they make up in that situation?

If you look at it like a hard-nosed old detective Zs story REEKS.

"Raining blows that felt like bricks"

Slamming of head over and over like his head was going to explode.

The almost erotic going for the gun and trapping the arm thing.

"You're gonna die tonight" whispered in his ear

Going to get an utterly useless address

Reaching for his phone at the crucial moment.

IF, and I say if, z is lying, its something like this he's lying about.
Click to expand...
The only thing that reeks is your assertion.
And if they do, they will look like fools as there is no evidence to support such a claim.
 
What if...? said:
Pretty sure he says he was walking away from his trucl when he said ok but continued on to RVC because he wanted to get an address and didnt know the name of twin trees.

Then hung up at RVC and THEN started waking back. Something about whacking a flashlight.

Still almost two minutes to cover a distance covered in 26 seconds in the walkthrough.
Click to expand...
Your time line is clearly off.
 
What if...? said:
Pretty sure he says he was walking away from his trucl when he said ok but continued on to RVC because he wanted to get an address and didnt know the name of twin trees.

Then hung up at RVC and THEN started waking back. Something about whacking a flashlight.

Still almost two minutes to cover a distance covered in 26 seconds in the walkthrough.
Click to expand...

That was his video reenactment and he changed a LOT between his written statement and that reenactment. His written statement has him returning to his truck as soon as dispatch made the comment about following.
 
Oceaura said:
That was his video reenactment and he changed a LOT between his written statement and that reenactment. His written statement has him returning to his truck as soon as dispatch made the comment about following.
Click to expand...


Oh yeah, he "remembers" ONLY things that make his story look better.

Not one irrelevant detail has been "recalled".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom