• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

OJ and Zimmerman... What's your opinion?

I believe that:

  • Both OJ and Zimmerman are/were NOT guilty

    Votes: 5 21.7%

  • Both OJ and Zimmerman are/were guilty

    Votes: 5 21.7%

  • OJ was guilty and Zimmerman is NOT guilty

    Votes: 12 52.2%

  • OJ was NOT guilty and Zimmerman is guilty

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Total voters
    23
  • Poll closed .
Grim17 said:
I watched that trial and saw that happen live. The very first thing that crossed my mind was that leather gloves shrink, because I remembered as a kid when I would play in the snow, how incredibly difficult it was the next day to get them on again.
Click to expand...

I understand that.
And have experienced it myself.
Even in expensive calf skin.
I understand the latex issue.



So I again have to point out...
that those gloves appear to still be supple.
and to look at the thumb area of his left hand.

Those gloves are not suffering from a shrinkage problem.

That is only an excuse.
 
And Johnnie Cochrane had rubbed a sticky substance on the latex gloves to make putting on the leather gloves even more difficult. He laughed about doing this a couple of years later when talking to some friends.
I can already hear at least one of the all White women jury whispering under her breath: "This one's for Nicole and Ron. What goes around comes around".
 
niff said:
And Johnnie Cochrane had rubbed a sticky substance on the latex gloves to make putting on the leather gloves even more difficult.
Click to expand...
I don't think you understand sarcasm.
So please link to this so it can be verified.
 
Excon said:
I don't think you understand sarcasm.
So please link to this so it can be verified.
Click to expand...

Margot, oops sorry Sharon overheard Johnnie when he was attending that famous dinner party she threw to welcome the Prince she had been treating back in KSA. I'm surprised you haven't already heard about it.
 
niff said:
Margot, oops sorry Sharon overheard Johnnie when he was attending that famous dinner party she threw to welcome the Prince she had been treating back in KSA. I'm surprised you haven't already heard about it.
Click to expand...
So you are saying that is what sharon alleged?
 
Just saw this and wonder why poll was closed? Could it be they didn't like the trend of 52% OJ was guilty and Zimmerman is NOT guilty and nearly 75% GZ not guilty?

I would of added to the 52%
 
Grim17 said:
From a personal standpoint, I haven't seen anything that would indicate to me Zimmerman want acting in self defense... From a legal standpoint, his case is just like OJ's trial, where all you need is reasonable doubt... Since there is no witnesses and no concrete evidence that contradicts Zimmerman's version of events, how can there not be reasonable doubt among some, if not every member of the jury?
Click to expand...

What I find more interesting than the actual case and disturbing at the same time are similarities in the attitudes of the public, regarding the cases. I was younger when the OJ Simpson trial was going on but from what I can recall and have since learned is in both cases there seem to be strong passions in support of the accused that seem to transcend the objective pursuit of justice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom