• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Experts say self-defense claim could be tough to refute in Trayvon Martin [W:177]

I was under the impression Z was out of his truck following T when I said that. I dont know, it seems we have a resident expert so I will go with what he says, fortuantely, Z will have to stand trial and these little discussions mean nothing anyway.
George was out wandering around for several minutes.. He wasn't headed back to his truck.
 
George was out wandering around for several minutes.. He wasn't headed back to his truck.

Even assuming your claim is true - which it's really not... at least not from the time he hung up with NEN... but someone can wander around... stop wandering around.. then head back to their truck. Just because he was "wandering around" does not exclude him from eventually returning to his vehicle and haveing Trayvon engage him.
 
4) Z was told not to follow T.

It was a request by a dispatcher, not a command or order from an officer. He was within his rights to follow.
 

She won't provide a link. But I would say what she typed in was fairly close to what was said.

Zimm didn't want to confront Trayvon. Zimm was not afraid that Trayvon had a weapon, even though he had put his hand in his waistband.
 
She won't provide a link. But I would say what she typed in was fairly close to what was said.

Zimm didn't want to confront Trayvon. Zimm was not afraid that Trayvon had a weapon, even though he had put his hand in his waistband.

None of it Googles. Interesting.
 
The state is going to have a hard time refuting the claim of self defense- that's where the case can easily be won by the defense," Baez said. "The state not only has to put forward their evidence, they have to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence and do so beyond a reasonable doubt - I don't think they can."

They only have to refute Zimmerman's claims. The burden is on Zimmerman, not the state, in an affirmative defense to prove he acted in self-defense. If I were on the jury, he would have a very tough time making me believe he was not the aggressor since he clearly had time to make the telephone call to the police before the shooting.
 
If Trayvon attacked George... George could have identified himself as NW.

Why? You think someone is gonna be like "oooh, neighborhood watch! I better just let this victim go!" What violent criminal gives a crap if someone claims to be NW?
 
Even assuming your claim is true - which it's really not... at least not from the time he hung up with NEN... but someone can wander around... stop wandering around.. then head back to their truck. Just because he was "wandering around" does not exclude him from eventually returning to his vehicle and haveing Trayvon engage him.

George could have returned to his truck in 30 seconds.. He was nowhere near his truck. He was 47 feet south on the dogwalk.
 
Why? You think someone is gonna be like "oooh, neighborhood watch! I better just let this victim go!" What violent criminal gives a crap if someone claims to be NW?

What "violent criminal" are you speaking of?
 
We will all have to wait for the jury.

As to predicting the jury, ask any lawyer.
Juries are notoriously unpredictable.
 
She won't provide a link. But I would say what she typed in was fairly close to what was said.

Zimm didn't want to confront Trayvon. Zimm was not afraid that Trayvon had a weapon, even though he had put his hand in his waistband.

George tells the NEN dispatch that TM has his hands at his waist.. to make Trayvon appear more sinister....... George lies like a six year old.
 
The one that viciously attacked George, his name was Tarayray iirc.

Sharon, I think you accidentally liked that post.
 
The one that viciously attacked George, his name was Tarayray iirc.

I know someone nicknamed "Baby Face" who has the dubious distinction of killing more FBI agents than anyone in history.
 
The one that viciously attacked George, his name was Tarayray iirc.

There is NO evidence that Trayvon attacked George... and George's injuries are minor.

George had time enough to say.. "This is a mistake.. I am with NW and I didn't recognize you as a resident"...

George was on a mission.. mindless. There is no excuse for him killing Trayvon.
 
I know someone nicknamed "Baby Face" who has the dubious distinction of killing more FBI agents than anyone in history.

If O'Mara has evidence of Trayvon fighting in and refereeing organized fights, his "baby face" will be lost to all.
 
There is NO evidence that Trayvon attacked George... and George's injuries are minor.

There is evidence that Trayvon attacked George.

George had time enough to say.. "This is a mistake.. I am with NW and I didn't recognize you as a resident"...

Assumption not supported by known facts.

George was on a mission.. mindless. There is no excuse for him killing Trayvon.

No one can know the operations of another's mind. Had he been on a "mindless mission," he wouldn't have even called the PD.
 
George could have returned to his truck in 30 seconds.. He was nowhere near his truck. He was 47 feet south on the dogwalk.

It was less than 2 minutes between when he hung up and when the encoutner occured...

And Trayvon could have been home even before George had hung up with NEN. He was nowhere near his home. He was well less than 47 feet south on the dogwalk.

Finally, as the lead investigator has already stated under oath... they have no evidece that Trayvon was not returning to his truck at the time of the encounter.
 
There is NO evidence that Trayvon attacked George...

That's so disconnected. How can I argue against it? When someone refuses well documented physical evidence and substitutes fantasy, where is there to go?
 
George tells the NEN dispatch that TM has his hands at his waist.. to make Trayvon appear more sinister....... George lies like a six year old.

Or maybe.. and this is the most likely... Trayvon really did have his hands in his waistband. I realize you hate George, his family, and his lawyers.. but not everything stated is a lie. Items contained in the NEN call are most likely to be true.
 
Back
Top Bottom