** EXPOSED : A Blatent LIE by O'Mara told to the court

sharon · Jun 2, 2013

mike2810 said:
Hence the quesiton mark, sharon. Unlike you I don't keep tabs of exactly who witness 1,2,3,4,...6,7,8, etc are.

I do know one of the main witness lied. You know that. My point where was your outrage over the lie. The defense has retracted their statement. How long did it take the witness to come clean?

Lawyers on both sides misspeak at times.

To make you all happy. It was wrong for the defense to make the statement in court. They did retract and have set the record straight. Move on.

They posted a video of black youth beating a black homeless man on a bus.

Paperview · Jun 2, 2013

And look how the OS pays us our due:

"On Thursday, in preparation for the anticipated release of the fight video, an Orlando Sentinel reporter drafted a story describing it, intending to publish it once the video had been made public.

A web producer prematurely posted it to OrlandoSentinel.com Friday but quickly took it down after discovering the video had not been released. The story correctly characterized the video.

After readers found a cached version of the story online Sunday, Zimmerman's attorneys released their statement and decided against posting the video."

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...n-martin-fight-video-20130602,0,6996223.story

See that part in red there? That would be me and one other very talented sleuther who first discovered it last night and we went to work.

And thanks to the multitudinous Tweets by Che Wua to the media.

And now...

Get that last bit???

Zimmerman's attorneys released their statement and ------------------------>decided against posting the video."

So they're NOT going to release it.

Holy shmoly on a frijole roll.

Excon · Jun 2, 2013

Paperview said:
And here's your ever loving PROOF (As if any one reading the Z-licker Rene Stultzman didn't know) of how the wench twists towards the defense.

Paperview said:
Found only by me and one other intent sleuther in the google cache.

I do not think you realizes how this sounds, or what it tells other about you.

Paperview said:
And here's your ever loving PROOF (As if any one reading the Z-licker Rene Stultzman didn't know) of how the wench twists towards the defense.

She posts that story last night. Found only by me and one other intent sleuther in the google cache.

Then deleted it from the server.

And after the team was caught RED ****ing handed -- what is the story that pops up today?

Look.

Prime and center....the TM fight video picture>>>>that has not even been authenticated as Trayvon <<<<< and just sort of nettles it in there about the other video that is the basis of the LIE O'Mara told.

Trayvon Martin fight video: He recorded two homeless men fighting over a bicycle
http://www.trbimg.com/img-519e3d32/turbine/os-george-zimmerman-evidence-photos-20130522-016/458/458x388[/IMG

By [URL="http://bio.tribune.com/ReneStutzman"]Rene Stutzman[/URL], Orlando Sentinel 3:46 p.m. EDT, June 2, 2013
[URL="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/topic/crime-law-justice/crimes/george-zimmerman-PECLB0000014809.topic"]George Zimmerman[/URL]'s attorneys today released a statement, backtracking on what they say a video of a fight found on [URL="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/topic/crime-law-justice/crimes/crime-victims/trayvon-martin-PEOCVC000188.topic"]Trayvon Martin[/URL]'s [URL="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/topic/services-shopping/electronic-devices/cell-phones-T50011099.topic"]cell phone[/URL] shows.

[URL="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/trayvon-martin/os-trayvon-martin-fight-video-20130602,0,6996223.story"]Trayvon Martin fight video - OrlandoSentinel.com[/URL]

there's your Damn PROOF!

Could it be any clearer???[/SIZE][/QUOTE]iLOL
The only proof you have it that it was a [B]misstatement[/B]. Ha, ha, ha! :lamo
Sadly, you are unable to see the truth.

And that picture of Trayvon with the stripped shirt, sporting the same tattoo that can be seen in other photos, is not the a picture of the video in question.

[QUOTE="Paperview, post: 1061879597, member: 21098"]O'MARA SHOULD BE SANCTIONED! Officer of the Court LIED to a Judge.[/QUOTE]

A misstatement is not a lie.

A deliberate misrepresentation like BDLR made about their obligation to turn over everything to the defense and impeding a fair trial though is.
Sadly, you are unable to see the truth.

[HR][/HR]

[QUOTE="sharon, post: 1061879627, member: 16782"]No they posted a video of a black homeless man being beaten on a bus because he smelled bad.

There was a boy with high cheekbones in a striped shirt.. that they claimed was Trayvon..

OMara is just sloppy.[/QUOTE]No sharon. As usual. you are wrong.
Someone asked if the was the video.

And that video does not comport with O'Mara said. As in, it was Two friends beating up a homeless man while Trayvon filmed it.
So how would the kid in the stripes be the one O'Mara stated, when he wasn't filming it?

Use your head, Mrs. I believe DD is a man.

sharon · Jun 2, 2013

Excon said:
I do not think you realizes how this sounds, or what it tells other about you.

iLOL
The only proof you have it that it was a misstatement. Ha, ha, ha! :lamo
Sadly, you are unable to see the truth.

And that picture of Trayvon with the stripped shirt, sporting the same tattoo that can be seen in other photos, is not the a picture of the video in question.

A misstatement is not a lie.

A deliberate misrepresentation like BDLR made about their obligation to turn over everything to the defense and impeding a fair trial though is.
Sadly, you are unable to see the truth.

No sharon. As usual. you are wrong.
Someone asked if the was the video.

And that video does not comport with O'Mara said. As in, it was Two friends beating up a homeless man while Trayvon filmed it.
So how would the kid in the stripes be the one O'Mara stated, when he wasn't filming it?

Use your head, Mrs. I believe DD is a man.

Hahahaha.. yes.. the morons who posted the bus video forgot that the claim was Trayvon FILMED the video.

Excon · Jun 2, 2013

mike2810 said:
Paperview said:

-- that wasn't even under oath -

Click to expand...

The witness lied. So we now know for you its ok to lie as long as its not in an offical hearing.

The problem here is that he is lying to you.
She did lie under oath, just as she lied in her answers to Crump.
Her deposition was sworn to.
Or in other words, under oath.

Excon · Jun 2, 2013

sharon said:
Hahahaha.. yes.. the morons who posted the bus video forgot that the claim was Trayvon FILMED the video.

Ha, ha ha!. The person asked.
Do you not know that means they don't know, and were asking? Hence the word asking. Duh!

Which is clearly different than what you do when you do not know.

Paperview · Jun 2, 2013

Found: John M Phillips, Esq represents the family of Jordan Davis, murdered by Michael Dunn for "loud music"...

John M. Phillips @JohnPhillips
As a professional, you don't make a "mistake" like this. Shame on you, @Markomaralaw and @GZlegalCase team- Orlando Sentinel

https://twitter.com/JohnPhillips

Excon · Jun 2, 2013

Paperview said:
Found: John M Phillips, Esq represents the family of Jordan Davis, murdered by Michael Dunn for "loud music"...

https://twitter.com/JohnPhillips

Ah, too bad!

Do you really think it matters what someone unaffiliated says?

You are ridiculously harping on a misstatement, or like what you now provide says, a mistake.
:doh

But based on Traybots previous absurdities I doubt they will understand that and continue to harp. What a shame.

ric27 · Jun 2, 2013

Paperview said:
Found: John M Phillips, Esq represents the family of Jordan Davis, murdered by Michael Dunn for "loud music"...

John M. Phillips @JohnPhillips
As a professional, you don't make a "mistake" like this. Shame on you, @Markomaralaw and @GZlegalCase team- Orlando Sentinel

https://twitter.com/JohnPhillips

The thread is misleading and legally means squat....There's a difference in being mistaken and telling a lie....but enough of this irrelevant and meaningless crap

What matters legally is whether M's physical assault on Z caused Z to reasonably believe he was in danger of serious bodily injury or even death.

What favors Z's testimony is.... the proof of his injuries and the support of witnesses observing the fight

That's the issue

Excon · Jun 2, 2013

ric27 said:
The thread is misleading and legally means squat....There's a difference in being mistaken and telling a lie....but enough of this irrelevant and meaningless crap

What matters legally is whether M's physical assault on Z caused Z to reasonably believe he was in danger of serious bodily injury or even death.

What favors Z's testimony is.... the proof of his injuries and the support of witnesses observing the fight

That's the issue

Which would be why they focus on irrelevancies.

Paperview · Jun 2, 2013

ric27 said:
The thread is misleading and legally means squat....There's a difference in being mistaken and telling a lie....but enough of this irrelevant and meaningless crap

...

How do you mistake watching a video about two homeless dudes fighting over a bike to trun that into

we have a video of
Trayvon's buddies beating up homeless men.

??

You DON't. And I think even you know how stupid that sounds.

buck · Jun 2, 2013

buck said:
As you indicate, you have no idea of the reason or who had the story removed.. I have no idea why you would choose reasons that make little to no sense, especially when there are many reasons that make far more sense then what you assume. Shrug.

And now we know why it was removed. Paperview was, very unsurprisingly, wrong.

On Thursday, in preparation for the anticipated release of the fight video, an Orlando Sentinel reporter drafted a story describing it, intending to publish it once the video had been made public. A web producer prematurely posted it to OrlandoSentinel.com Friday but quickly took it down after discovering the video had not been released. The story correctly characterized the video. After readers found a cached version of the story online Sunday, Zimmerman's attorneys released their statement and decided against posting the video.

Just think had he (as he indicated) not found the cached story... omara would have released the video and Renee would have had her story published - countering Omara's claim.

Sure sounds like something a "Z-Licker" would do to me :roll:

It seems much more likely that he just doesn't like the facts, so when the facts are reported on he assumes the reporter is a "Z-Licker". I wonder what he'll have to say about those experts HLNTV keep trotting out.

ric27 · Jun 2, 2013

Paperview said:
How do you mistake watching a video about two homeless dudes fighting over a bike to trun that into

we have a video of
Trayvon's buddies beating up homeless men.

??

You DON't. And I think even you know how stupid that sounds.

It will go down as a mistake....so, move on

The issue your side has now..... is finding evidence that would justify M’s physical attack on Z.

Especially when you have zero evidence Z used force against M before M being shot

Paperview · Jun 2, 2013

buck said:
And now we know why it was removed. Paperview was, very unsurprisingly, wrong.

Just think had he (as he indicated) not found the cached story... omara would have released the video and Renee would have had her story published - countering Omara's claim.

Sure sounds like something a "Z-Licker" would do to me :roll:

It seems much more likely that he just doesn't like the facts, so when the facts are reported on he assumes the reporter is a "Z-Licker". I wonder what he'll have to say about those experts HLNTV keep trotting out.

What in the hay-ell are you talking about?

I just posted above that OS clip:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimme...nt-lie-omara-told-court-2.html#post1061879666

He found the cached version??? What the hell. Who is HE?

It was two dedicated sleuthers who found the cached version. Me and another Trayvon Warrior - and with the help of another who tweeted out the cache to media far and wide.

We are being honored for our work right now -- because you know what WE did?

We yes WE -- got O'Mara to pucker up his snarly long face and deliver an apology today.

Yes WE did that.

You'll excuse me at the moment, but I have been asked to be introduced to attorneys from the TM camp who have asked WHO it was that uncovered the cache and broke this story, and would like to meet us.

I'll Be Back later gaters...

Paperview · Jun 2, 2013

Oh, one more thing before I leave:

Che Wua ‏@Che_Wua 2m Know this @Markomaralaw & @GZLegalCase no one believes this was unintentional mistake. You're on notice, and so is your shill @renestutzman

Excon · Jun 2, 2013

Paperview said:
Oh, one more thing before I leave:

Che Wua ‏@Che_Wua 2m Know this @Markomaralaw & @GZLegalCase no one believes this was unintentional mistake. You're on notice, and so is your shill @renestutzman

Surrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrre :slapme: except that the tweet you previously provided says it is a mistake.

So who is lying now?

And that above info is absurdity at it's best. Ha ha ha!
You got nothing accept innuendo and supposition.

Paperview said:
We are being honored for our work right now -- because you know what WE did?

We yes WE -- got O'Mara to pucker up his snarly long face and deliver an apology today.

Yes WE did that.

Really?
You did that, huh.

Unless proven it was you, and not another, you are again misrepresenting the truth.

So prove what you say.

And btw, your vile hatred of someone who did nothing to you is noted.

sharon · Jun 2, 2013

Excon said:
Surrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrre :slapme: except that the tweet you previously provided says it is a mistake.

So who is lying now?

And that above info is absurdity at it's best. Ha ha ha!
You got nothing accept innuendo and supposition.

Really?
You did that, huh.

Unless proven it was you, and not another, you are again misrepresenting the truth.

So prove what you say.

And btw, your vile hatred of someone who did nothing to you is noted.

OMara lied.. You can catch it on videos of the last hearing and the press conference afterwards.

ric27 · Jun 2, 2013

sharon said:
OMara lied.. You can catch it on videos of the last hearing and the press conference afterwards.

Please, you don't have any credibility to say such a thing....

Excon · Jun 2, 2013

sharon said:
OMara lied.. You can catch it on videos of the last hearing and the press conference afterwards.

No sharon, he didn't.
And as previously pointed out, you have some gall spouting that bs.

Next!

Paperview · Jun 2, 2013

I think I have it figured out.

ExCON is Shellie.

lol

mike2810 · Jun 2, 2013

Excon said:
The problem here is that he is lying to you.
She did lie under oath, just as she lied in her answers to Crump.
Her deposition was sworn to.
Or in other words, under oath.

Thanks. I was going to let it slide. The witness lied during a deposition, which is under oath.
Like s&g said in the boxer.
"All lies and jests
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest"

The TM side is good at that.

Sheik Yerbuti · Jun 2, 2013

mike2810 said:
Thanks. I was going to let it slide. The witness lied during a deposition, which is under oath.
Like s&g said in the boxer.
"All lies and jests
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest"

The TM side is good at that.

Oh? What lie did she tell?

buck · Jun 2, 2013

Paperview said:
What in the hay-ell are you talking about?

I just posted above that OS clip:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimme...nt-lie-omara-told-court-2.html#post1061879666

He found the cached version??? What the hell. Who is HE?

It was two dedicated sleuthers who found the cached version. Me and another Trayvon Warrior - and with the help of another who tweeted out the cache to media far and wide.

Yes, you are the "he". Had you not found the cached version, Omara would have posted the video... Renee's story would have been posted contradicting Omara's description of the video. Not something a supposed "Z-licker" would have done.

We are being honored for our work right now -- because you know what WE did?

We yes WE -- got O'Mara to pucker up his snarly long face and deliver an apology today.

Yes WE did that.

And had you not, the outcome would have been the same. the video would have been posted, Renee would post her story and Omara would have issued an apology.

buck · Jun 2, 2013

Paperview said:
Oh, one more thing before I leave:

Che Wua ‏@Che_Wua 2m Know this @Markomaralaw & @GZLegalCase no one believes this was unintentional mistake. You're on notice, and so is your shill @renestutzman

Oh, BTW, can you post a story where you think that Renee is being a shill rather then just reporting a story? Have you started calling out HLNTV yet, for having expert opinions that vary greatly from yours? A shill would not have typed up a story ready to be posted once video was released contradicting the individuals narrative they were allegedly shilling for.

Paperview · Jun 2, 2013