• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

What the state doesn't want said of Trayvon Martin at trial [W:326]

Moderator's Warning:
Personal attacks and off-topic comments need to stop now.
 
I just started looking more closely at this case...especially after these latest rulings. As someone once said... or something to the effect. "it looks like someone is being set up for a high tech lynching"

This case is seething with racism from both sides and believe we'll see massive protests and violence regardless of the end result.

Anyway...It will be interesting to see how the jury selection goes along with opening arguments.
 
JackFrost said:
According to the paramedic report, the vigilante neighborhood watch captain was on the prescription drug Temazepam, reports MSNBC.com.

Temazepam, also known as Restoril, is known to cause insomnia and anxiety, reports MSNBC. But there are more important side effects that were not mentioned.

According to the U.S. National Library of Medicine, the drug is also known to cause “aggressiveness” and “hallucinations,” among other problematic symptoms.

George Zimmerman on Prescription Drugs That Cause Aggression, Paranoia, When He Killed Trayvon | Breaking News for Black America

The defense fought to keep Zimmerman's drug out. Why can't the prosecution do the same? Admit both or none. It is only fair and impartial.
Click to expand...


Temazepam - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The drug is used to treat insomnia. So you think he took it prior to going on neighborhood watch?
 
Stardog said:
Yea, it does. The defendant admitted to being on it.
Click to expand...
No it doesn't.
You were doing nothing more than deflecting.
You were asked if you thought he took it prior to going on neighborhood watch?
Telling the EMT he was prescribed a medication does not answer the question that was asked.
 
Excon said:
No it doesn't.
You were doing nothing more than deflecting.
You were asked if you thought he took it prior to going on neighborhood watch?
Telling the EMT he was prescribed a medication does not answer the question that was asked.
Click to expand...

He didn't say he was prescribed. He said he was on it. It's called an admission against interest. But you wouldn't know that because you're not educated in the law.
 
Stardog said:
He didn't say he was prescribed. He said he was on it.
Click to expand...

Really?
Why is it you are always being untruthful about the evidence?
Even if he had worded something like that it would mean he has a prescription for it. Not that he had taken it at a specific time.

Regardless you are wrong as usual.

You were doing nothing more than deflecting.
You were asked if you thought he took it prior to going on neighborhood watch?
Telling the EMT he was prescribed a medication does not answer the question that was asked.​

Prove it. Or stop lying.

You think he just said he was on it. iLOL Doh! Prove it.
You think he told the Paramedic he had taken that medication that evening. Prove it.

While we all await your inability to prove what you say.
Deal with the real evidence and the reports of it.

Paramedic interviews. Nothing in them about being "on" anything.
Tyler Rocehfort (Paramedic Sanford Fire Department)
Interview Mp3

Stacey Livingston (Paramedic Sanford Fire Department)
Interview Mp3

Michael Brandy (Paramedic Sanford Fire Department)
Interview Mp3

Kevin O’Rourke (Firefighter/EMT Sanford Fire Department)
Interview Mp3

Lt. Michael Turner (Supervisor – Sanford Fire Department)
http://trayvon.axiomamnesia.com/wp-...e-Zimmerman-Audio-TurnerFDLE03242012.mp3[/url​



Zimmerman himself was on a [highlight]prescription[/highlight] for Tamazepam, according to the paramedic's incident report reproducing his medical records.
[url=http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/05/17/11748468-court-docs-trayvon-martin-shooting-ultimately-avoidable-by-zimmerman?]Court docs: Trayvon Martin shooting 'ultimately avoidable by Zimmerman' - Open Channel​


According to the report, prior to the shooting Zimmerman had been [highlight]prescribed[/highlight] Adderall and Temazepam,
George Zimmerman Medical Report Sheds Light on Injuries After Trayvon Martin Shooting - ABC News​

And here are the reports that the above articles speak of.
Nothing in them about him having taken that medication at the time of the shooting.
But they sure do document the damage of ™'s attack.


med.jpg

Paramedic Report listing Medications he was [highlight]prescribed[/highlight].


Personal medical report listing the medications he was [highlight]prescribed[/highlight].
Zimmerman's Medical Report

Damn, seems you have been caught again not being truthful.



Stardog said:
It's called an admission against interest. But you wouldn't know that because you're not educated in the law.
Click to expand...
Oh look at you. You think you learned something, yet are misapplying it.
Guess you need to go back to school.

Zimmerman''s medical reports are evidence . Period.
Suggesting that he suffered from a side effect that affects a very limited amount of those who are prescribed it, is out of the question unless it can be shown that he was suffering from those side effects. And that just can't be done with the known evidence.
 
Last edited:
Excon said:
Really?
Click to expand...

Yea, really.

Funny in the report you posted it doesn't say z was "prescribed" his drugs. It says he was "medicated" on those drugs.
Since you clearly don't understand what a statement against interest is you should probably start with something smaller like what the difference between "Prescribed" and "Medicated" is.

These are the best debates ever. I tell you, you are wrong and you come back with the evidence that proves me right. LOL! :lamo

You better get ready for trial. Oh, wait, there wasn't supposed to be a trial. LoL!
 
Stardog said:
Yea, really.

Funny in the report you posted it doesn't say z was "prescribed" his drugs. It says he was "medicated" on those drugs.
Since you clearly don't understand what a statement against interest is you should probably start with something smaller like what the difference between "Prescribed" and "Medicated" is.

These are the best debates ever. I tell you, you are wrong and you come back with the evidence that proves me right. LOL! :lamo

You better get ready for trial. Oh, wait, there wasn't supposed to be a trial. LoL!
Click to expand...
Wow, it took you that long to come up with such a lame excuse.
All you have been proven to be, is wrong! Over and over again.


You are wrong, were wrong and will obviously continue to be wrong.

You have yet to show where he said he was "on" anything that evening.

Any level headed intelligent person knows they are speaking to his prescriptions.

Now get to proving what you said. As we all know you can't because what you said was untruthful. Push on instead.
 
Excon said:
Wow, it took you that long to come up with such a lame excuse.
All you have been proven to be, is wrong! Over and over again.


You are wrong, were wrong and will obviously continue to be wrong.

You have yet to show where he said he was "on" anything that evening.

Any level headed intelligent person knows they are speaking to his prescriptions.

Now get to proving what you said. As we all know you can't because what you said was untruthful. Push on instead.
Click to expand...

There goes the meltdown folks! LOL! :2party:
 
Excon said:
How sad. Still up to the same ol' dishonesty .
Click to expand...

he's following my grandfather's advice.... stick with what you're good at ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom