- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
You said, "I would say yes."With what?
You said, "I would say yes."With what?
You said, "I would say yes."
Does anybody here have a problem when another speaks out their ass?
I wouldn't be.
Then you are not normal.
It is?In response to this^^
The question you brought up was "does anybody have a problem" to which I gave an affirmative, as the "another" "speaking out their ass" would be me.
"I would say yes", to others having a problem with what I say.
This is correct.
It is?
So you do have a problem then?
:dohI do not have a problem speaking out my ass.
:doh
That's nice to know.
Did anybody say you did?
I am saying it now. Problem?
Gained weight? Well then he must be guilty.
Makes as much sense as anything the lynch mob has said.
A trial consultant said weight gain might hinder a defendant facing a violent crime charge.
A spokesman for his attorney declined to be very specific about Zimmerman’s weight gain because, he said, it might play a role in the trial.
Not at all.
Hey, I hear the 49er's are looking for someone to play quarterback for their team while sitting at home. You would be perfect for the job.
No you implied it.You implied it.
No it will not be used against him.The point of this thread, if you bothered to read the article, or the part I quoted in the OP, is that Zimmerman's weight gain will be used against him.
Anyone care to debate this?
No you implied it.
I asked a question to which you answered affirmatively.
Maybe you did not understand the question.
I asked the following.
"Does anybody here have a problem when another speaks out their ass?"
That is asking anybody if they have a problem with such.
You answered that you do, when you said, "I would say yes."
Obviously that is what you now think.Maybe I didn't, but that is how I took it.
"I would say yes", meaning somebody has a problem, not necessarily myself.
No it will not be used against him.
Obviously that is what you think.
But it is not what I asked.
Care to expand upon that, as a spokesman for O'Mara and a trial consultant believe otherwise?
I doubt people will extrapolate from his weight gain that he's guilty. O'Mara may have been referring to the natural prejudice many people have against obese people. They won't like him.
I doubt people will extrapolate from his weight gain that he's guilty. O'Mara may have been referring to the natural prejudice many people have against obese people. They won't like him.
If you're obese (and chances of that are pretty good in America right now), your odds of being found guilty in a jury trial are higher than if you're skinny. If you're an obese woman, things in court can be even uglier.
"Weight discrimination has increased by 66 percent in the past decade," says Rebecca Puhl, the center's director of research and weight stigma initiatives. "There is certainly a need for remedies at both the state and federal levels."
Care to expand upon that, as a spokesman for O'Mara and a trial consultant believe otherwise?
It will not be a card played by the Prosecution.
And the article made it clear as to what type of influence the weight gain "could" possibly have.
This is not significant as the jury will know that Zimmerman was not this large at the time of the incident.
Nor does it matter to the fear of great bodily injury or loss of life he felt.
All this you should already know, so your posting of such is nothing more than you just trying to get another shot in at Zimmerman because of his appearance.
Your post says more about you than it does about him.