• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

George Zimmerman lawyers to judge: Sanction state for 'personal attacks'

Another case of you accusing someone of something, and providing zero evidence.
Holy ****!
Stop with your false claims.
If that were the case at this point, you would be guilty of it, not I.

The lack of evidence being turned over in a timely matter is what we are discussing. Which is what O'Mara is requesting sanctions for.
That is the evidence. Duh.

a defense motion which argued the state delayed in turning over important information to Zimmerman and should be fined,


In addition.
From the article you posted.
• A demand for any data from Trayvon Martin's cell phone that hasn't been turned over yet.

• A demand for any "cleaned up, edited and/or enhanced version" of the 911 call which captured the screams which led up to the shooting of 17-year-old Trayvon Feb. 26 in Sanford.

That request stems from comments made by Martin family attorney Benjamin Crump: Police claim Trayvon's father, Tracy Martin, listened to the call and said the screams weren't his son's, but Crump has said Tracy Martin actually told police he couldn't identify the voice, due to distortion, but later heard a cleaned-up version and was sure it was Trayvon.​

The above should already been handed over. Long ago.
 
Last edited:
:doh

No it hasn't.

And no it wasn't.

“There’s a lot that we cannot release by law, and so we’re still asking people to wait and look at all of the evidence,” - Angela B. Corey

"Stop trying any of our cases in the media. Let us try them in the courtroom," said Corey.

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/Trayv...close-the-door-on-public-records-before-trial

This is why George Zimmerman ate his way to 300+ pounds. O'Mara wants all of the information, which he cannot have. This is the reason why he continues to file trivial motions, and skipped the immunity hearing. George has no defense.
 
Holy ****!
Stop with your false claims.
If that were the case at this point, you would be guilty of it, not I.

The lack of evidence being turned over in a timely matter is what we are discussing. Which is what O'Mara is requesting sanctions for.
That is the evidence. Duh.

a defense motion which argued the state delayed in turning over important information to Zimmerman and should be fined,


In addition.
From the article you posted.
• A demand for any data from Trayvon Martin's cell phone that hasn't been turned over yet.

• A demand for any "cleaned up, edited and/or enhanced version" of the 911 call which captured the screams which led up to the shooting of 17-year-old Trayvon Feb. 26 in Sanford.

That request stems from comments made by Martin family attorney Benjamin Crump: Police claim Trayvon's father, Tracy Martin, listened to the call and said the screams weren't his son's, but Crump has said Tracy Martin actually told police he couldn't identify the voice, due to distortion, but later heard a cleaned-up version and was sure it was Trayvon.​

The above should already been handed over. Long ago.

The motions are delay tactics, red herrings.
 
:doh

No it hasn't.

And no it wasn't.
“There’s a lot that we cannot release by law, and so we’re still asking people to wait and look at all of the evidence,” - Angela B. Corey

"Stop trying any of our cases in the media. Let us try them in the courtroom," said Corey.
Angela Corey wants to close the door on public records before trial | firstcoastnews.com

This is why George Zimmerman ate his way to 300+ pounds. O'Mara wants all of the information, which he cannot have. This is the reason why he continues to file trivial motions, and skipped the immunity hearing. George has no defense.
:doh:doh:doh

Wow!
Talk about dishonesty in debate.
This is as bad, if not worse than, your plagiarism.

You are basically lying to everybody in your misrepresentation.
Either that, or you really have no clue. Which one is it?

Corey's statement was to the media and the public. Not to the defense. And from nearly a year ago.
Stop being dishonest.


Here is the exact quote.

"What the media and the general public has to remember is that there's a lot that we cannot release by law, so we're asking people to wait and look at all of the evidence," said Corey.
 
Last edited:
:naughty
No.
It is the Prosecutor who is delaying in not handing them over.

The prosecution has handed over all discovery evidence in a timely manner according to the law. Besides accusations, do you or the defense have proof?
 
The prosecution has handed over all discovery evidence in a timely manner according to the law. Besides accusations, do you or the defense have proof?
Doh!
:doh

:naughty
Obviously they haven't, or there would be no reason to ask for them now.
 
You do have nothing
Look at you with your idiotic false claims again.
It is you who has nothing, and are obviously blind or have failed to read that which you yourself have provided.

From the article you posted.
• A demand for any data from Trayvon Martin's cell phone that hasn't been turned over yet.

• A demand for any "cleaned up, edited and/or enhanced version" of the 911 call which captured the screams which led up to the shooting of 17-year-old Trayvon Feb. 26 in Sanford.

That request stems from comments made by Martin family attorney Benjamin Crump: Police claim Trayvon's father, Tracy Martin, listened to the call and said the screams weren't his son's, but Crump has said Tracy Martin actually told police he couldn't identify the voice, due to distortion, but later heard a cleaned-up version and was sure it was Trayvon.​

The above should already been handed over. Long ago.
 
Look at you with your idiotic false claims again.
It is you who has nothing, and are obviously blind or have failed to read that which you yourself have provided.


Delay tactics, red herrings are proof of nothing.
 
Delay tactics, red herrings are proof of nothing.
And again the delay tactic is coming from the prosecution in not turning over the requested info.

The defense shouldn't even have to ask.
 
In Florida, they have to do their own homework.
:doh
What a pathetic response.
They are doing their homework by requesting the prosecution do what it is supposed to do.
 
:doh
What a pathetic response.
They are doing their homework by requesting the prosecution do what it is supposed to do.

According to Florida Law, the prosecution has done all they are supposed to do.

Not the Prosecutions fault O'Mara does not know the law.
 
This is getting ridiculous.
According to Florida Law, the prosecution has done all they are supposed to do.
No they haven't. That is evidenced by the fact that O'Mara has to keep asking for stuff they haven't turned over.
Nor does the Prosecution decide that which the Defense is entitled to.


But since you made the claim of according to "Florida Law", prove they have done all that they are supposed to do.
Heck, you wouldn't even know where to begin.



Not the Prosecutions fault O'Mara does not know the law.
:naughty
You got that reversed.
It is the Prosecutions fault for not turning over that which the Defense is entitled to.
 
Last edited:
According to Florida Law, the prosecution has done all they are supposed to do.

Not the Prosecutions fault O'Mara does not know the law.

What Florida law?

lol
 
This is getting ridiculous.
No they haven't. That is evidenced by the fact that O'Mara has to keep asking for stuff they haven't turned over.
Nor does the Prosecution decided that which the Defense is entitled to.


But since you made the claim of according to "Florida Law", prove they have done all that they are supposed to do.
Heck, you wouldn't even know where to begin.



:naughty
You got that reversed.
It is the Prosecutions fault for not turning over that which the Defense is entitled to.

According to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.22 (b) Prosecutors Discovery Obligation, the Prosecution has not violated any of the rules contained within.

If they have violated the rules of discovery, please show proof.
 
According to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.22 (b) Prosecutors Discovery Obligation, the Prosecution has not violated any of the rules contained within.

If they have violated the rules of discovery, please show proof.
:doh
Look at you, again trying to dodge.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.

Here is the pdf which contains the rule.


Now show why the Prosecution has not already turned over that which is being requested.
 
:doh
Look at you, again trying to dodge.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.

Here is the pdf which contains the rule.


Now show why the Prosecution has not already turned over that which is being requested.

• A demand for any data from Trayvon Martin's cell phone that hasn't been turned over yet.

A fishing expedition. DISMISSED!

• A demand for any "cleaned up, edited and/or enhanced version" of the 911 call which captured the screams which led up to the shooting of 17-year-old Trayvon Feb. 26 in Sanford.

This will be protected under (g) Matters Not Subject to Disclosure (1) Work Product. There is nothing in the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.22 (b) Prosecutors Discovery Obligation that states they must turn over a recording they had enhanced. They turned over the original recording, and may have turned over an enhanced version already. I have to look at the discovery again. Either way, the defense can have someone enhance it themselves. DISMISSED!
 
A fishing expedition. DISMISSED!
Really?
ilol
:doh
:lamo
Yes you are dismissed.
They are entitled to any information on the or about the phone, as it is evidence.

Secondly, where are the phones ping records?




This will be protected under (g) Matters Not Subject to Disclosure (1) Work Product. There is nothing in the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.22 (b) Prosecutors Discovery Obligation that states they must turn over a recording they had enhanced. They turned over the original recording, and may have turned over an enhanced version already. I have to look at the discovery again. Either way, the defense can have someone enhance it themselves. DISMISSED!
Holy ****!
:lamo
Double Doh! :doh :doh
That is not work product.
So you again fail.

Secondly, it goes directly to Tracy's claim that he changed his mind as to who was screaming after hearing the cleaned up recording.
They are entitled to it.
Most likely it doesn't exist, and thus will just be another one of the lies coming from the family and team Crump.
 
Really?
ilol
:doh
:lamo
Yes you are dismissed.
They are entitled to any information on the or about the phone, as it is evidence.

Secondly, where are the phones ping records?




Holy ****!
:lamo
Double Doh! :doh :doh
That is not work product.
So you again fail.

Secondly, it goes directly to Tracy's claim that he changed his mind as to who was screaming after hearing the cleaned up recording.
They are entitled to it.
Most likely it doesn't exist, and thus will just be another one of the lies coming from the family and team Crump.

What violation did the Prosecution commit? You still have not provided any evidence of such.
 
What violation did the Prosecution commit? You still have not provided any evidence of such.
Holy ****.
Stop playing games.
The evidence is that they haven't received all the information yet, which is evidenced by their request.
What is it?
You do not think they know (unlikely) what type of records come from a phone?
Or is it they know (most likely) and just don't have them yet?

Like I said. Where are the ping records.
 
Back
Top Bottom