- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Wrong!Nope, I'm right as usual.
And so typical. Just another false statement from you.
It figures.
Wrong!Nope, I'm right as usual.
Remember the bond hearing? Z couldn't even apologize to the Martin family w/o lying.
what lie did he tell
The one he told.
In reading this thread I find it interesting this line of posting.
Would it not have been helpful to let the reader know what lies were being refered to?
When asked, a one liner response was given , which does nothing to clarify or support the orginal statement.
this of course is just an observation and an opinion. Makes me wonder why some don't take the time to provide information to their statements.
In his bond hearing.. George said that he thought TM was older.. closer to his age. He gave an apology that was back-handed and lacked remorse.. He essentially blamed Trayvon for his own death. Watch the video.
No sharon, That is your take on it.In his bond hearing.. George said that he thought TM was older.. closer to his age. He gave an apology that was back-handed and lacked remorse.. He essentially blamed Trayvon for his own death. Watch the video.
I have. My point is if someone wants to make a statement and claim it as fact, then back it up with a source. You tried by providing a summary, What would not hurt is provide a link to the tape. That way we all are looking at the same source. It would not hurt even to provide direct quotes.
My point, some posters are a lot like posters on conspiracy threads. Make one liners, make statements without backing it up with a source to be reviewed.
Thanks for you reply.
I won't agree it was back handed or lacked remorse.
No sharon, That is your take on it.
Nor does it say he lied.
As was previously pointed out, a person can beleive one thing, change their mind because of the circumstances, only to later change their mind again given new information. None of which makes it a lie.
Duh!
Figures you would respond with irrelevant bs.Have you ever made a mistake and inadvertently caused someone harm or fear?
I ran over a man's foot at Orly Airport and he came at me screaming.. I crouched down picked up his shoe and apologised profusely. Adults don't have to behave like idiots.
Figures you would respond with irrelevant bs.
I do not know if you do, or do not.Polly want a cracker?
Most people have been following the evidence (not the press) for over a year.
George restated his lack of remose on the disasterous Hannity interview.. claiming it was "God's Plan".
I am still flabbergasted that OMara allowed that FUBAR.
Sharon.
If I made a post in which I stated that witness X lied. Would you not want to know what witness X said that I thought was a lie?
If you asked me what lie and I responsed, the one that witness X said. How does that help you understand or believe what I posted?
This is too far off topic and not important enough to continue. Posters are going to post the way they do. It doesn't help ones creditability if its just one liners with no backup of evidence.
You would have to do so for it to become tiresome. I can point out post after post where you refuse to support your claims.Many posters have linked evidence dozens and dozens of times.. It becomes tiresome.
You would have to do so for it to become tiresome. I can point out post after post where you refuse to support your claims.
47 feet
300 yards
no cash or card
cut thru Colonial Village
So it can not be tiresome for you, as you do not do it.
Sharon you have repeatedly failed to support what you say.You have to pay close attention..........
There was absolutely no justifiable reason my son should have been charged for a crime he didn't commit and there was no just reason he should find himself incarcerated either.
The plan isn't to carry on any semblance of a debate based on evidence. The point is and has been and always will to 'bait' and 'troll' to get attention. This is quite common in people who spent their formative years away from their parents. In adulthood they crave the attention they never received as children. The form of attention is not important. 'Negative' attention is in many cases sought out as it's usually more 'intense'.Sharon you have repeatedly failed to support what you say.
And you continually show that you do not pay attention in the least.
The plan isn't to carry on any semblance of a debate based on evidence. The point is and has been and always will to 'bait' and 'troll' to get attention. This is quite common in people who spent their formative years away from their parents. In adulthood they crave the attention they never received as children. The form of attention is not important. 'Negative' attention is in many cases sought out as it's usually more 'intense'.
Just understand who we are dealing with and 'husband' the bandwidth.
You bet I do.What other forums did all this occur on, i'm curious? Seems like you really have someone figured out.
Moderator's Warning: |
If you can't stick to the topic you will be removed. If you don't stop with the personal attacks, you will be removed. Anything off-topic or attacks launched against another will result in an infraction as well. |
That is in fact all she ever does....no matter what forum she's on. It's always some ludicrous claim. She knows this will get her the negative attention she craves. Then when some one asks for a link not one time ever has she put one up. I repeat. Not one time has she ever put one up. It's always "read the evidence dumps". Some poor sap will go look at the "dumps" and not find what she is claiming then comes back and the response is "I'm not going to do your work for you". Pretty pathetic. She needs professional help.Figures you would respond with irrelevant bs.